摘要
显失公平制度在大陆法和英美法中均有规定和体现,但对其构成要件和法律后果,不同国家立法规定存在差异,学说上也有争议。本文从比较研究的角度,对构成显失公平的客观要件和主观要件进行了详细讨论,提出了在我国现有立法基础上显失公平构成要件的法律适用规则,阐释了显失公平所导致法律后果的具体内容。
Content abstract: Both the Civil law and Anglo-American law regulate the Doctrine of Unconscionability,but countries' legislations differ in its constituents and legal consequences,and academic controversies also exsit.From the angle of comparative study,this article makes a detailed discussion about the objective elements and the subjective elements of unconscionability,put forward its rules of applicable law based on the existing legislation in our country,and interprets the specific content of legal consequences caused by unconscionability.
出处
《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第3期27-34,共8页
Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词
显失公平
客观要件
主观要件
法律后果
unconscionability
objective elements
subjective elements
legal consequences