期刊文献+

皮肤电传导率用于硬膜外麻醉丙泊酚镇静的监测

Skin conductance during epidural anesthesia monitoring of propofol sedation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在硬膜外麻醉下靶控输注(target-controlled infusion,TCI)异丙酚镇静下,皮肤电传导率(skin conductance,SC)在监测意识状态的应用。方法择期硬膜外麻醉骨科手术患者30例,年龄22~47岁,体重51~83 kg,美国麻醉医师协会(The American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级,无术前用药,无心、肺疾病,无气道通气障碍;硬膜外麻醉起效后,用异丙酚输注泵靶控异丙酚,以0.6μg/ml为初始浓度,以0.6μg/ml递增,直至改良镇静警醒(OAA/S)评分≤2级,停止靶控输注,患者逐步恢复意识,直至OAA/S评分恢复至5级,每3分钟评价OAA/S评分,同时记录SC、MAP和HR。结果 SC能较好地反映病人镇静时的意识状态(P〈0.01);OAA/S评分与SC有显著相关性,r为-0.859(P〈0.01),明显好于MAP和HR。结论 SC能正确反映靶控输注异丙酚镇静时的镇静深度。 Objective To investigate epidural anesthesia under propofol sedation,skin conductance(skin conductance,SC) in monitoring the application of consciousness.Methods Thirty American society of anesthesiologists(ASA) Ⅰ~Ⅱ patients,aged 22~47 years,weighing 51~83 kg,epidural anesthesia for orthopedics surgery were enrolled into this study.None of the participants received premedication on the day of surgery.After the onset of epidural anesthesia,TCI of propofol was initiated at target plasma concentration of 0.6 μg/ml,increased by 0.6 μg/ml until OAA/S≤2 stop the target controlled infusion,the patients were gradually regained consciousness,until the OAA/S score returned to 5,every 3 minutes evaluated the OAA/S score,SC,MAP and heart rate(HR) values were recorded.Results SC through research that can better reflect the patients′ state of consciousness during sedation(P0.01),significantly better than MAP and HR;The OAA/S score had negtive correlation with SC(r=-0.859,P0.01).In the OAA/S score comparisons for each level,SC was better than MAP,HR.Conclusion SC can accurately reflect the target-controlled infusion of propofol sedation.
出处 《新疆医科大学学报》 CAS 2011年第4期407-409,共3页 Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
关键词 血压 心率 皮肤电传导率 清醒镇静 异丙酚 靶控输注 blood pressure heart rate skin conductance conscious sedation propofol target-controlled infusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Katoh T,Bito H,Sato S,et al.Influence of age on hypnotic equirement,bispectral Index and 95%spectral edge frequency associated with sedation induced by Sevoflurane[J].Anesthesiology,2000,92(7):55-61.
  • 2Storm H,Fremming A,Oedegaard S,et al.The development of a software program for analysing spontan-eous and elicited skin conductance changes in infants and adults[J].Clin Neurophysiol,2000,111(8):1889-1898.
  • 3Critchley HD,Elliott R,Mathias CJ,et al.Neural activityrelating to generation and representation of galvanic skin conductante responses:a functional magnetic resonance imaging study[J].Neurosci,2000,20(2):3033-3040.
  • 4Lidberg L,Wallin G.Sympathhetic skin nerve discharges in relation toamplitude of skin resistance responses[J].Psychopysiology,1981,8(3):268-270.
  • 5于布为,彭章龙,赵永泉.高龄病人异丙酚分步TCI时效应室浓度及BIS的变化[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2002,22(12):711-714. 被引量:44
  • 6Storm H,Sha?ei M,Myre K,Raeder j.Palmar skin conductance compared to a developed stress score and to noxious and awakening stimuli on patients in anaesthesia[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2005,49(6):798-803.
  • 7陈勇,佘守章,闫焱,许学兵.腰-硬联合麻醉患者异丙酚不同镇静深度下半数有效的浓度、脑电双频指数和听觉诱发电位指数[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(2):105-107. 被引量:12

二级参考文献17

  • 1IselinChavesIA, E1MoalemHE, GanTJ, etal. Changes in the auditory evoked potentials and the bispectral index following propofol or propofol and alfentanil. Anesthesiology, 2000,92:1300-1310.
  • 2Lysakowski C, Durmont L, Pellegrini M, et al. Effects of fentanyl,alfentanil, remifentanil and sufentanil on loss of consciousness and bispectral index during propofol induction of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth,2001,86: 523-527.
  • 3Milne SE, Troy A, Irwin MG, et al. Relationship between bispectral index, auditory evoked potential index and effect-site EC50 for propofol at two clinical end-points. Br J Anaesth, 2003,90:127-131.
  • 4Struys MM, Jensen EW, Smith W, et al. Performance of the ARXderived auditory evoked potential index as an indicator of anesthetic depth: a comparison with bispectral index and hemodynamic measures during propofol administration. Anesthesiology,2002, 96:803-816.
  • 5Tverskoy M, Fleyshman G, Bachrak L, et al. Effect of bupivacaineinduced spinal block on the hypnotic requirement of propofol.Anaesthesia, 1996,51: 652-653.
  • 6Schraag S, Bothner U, Gajraj R, et al. The performance of electroencephalogram bispectral index and auditory evoked potential index to predict loss of consciousness during propofol infusion. Anesth Analg,1999,89:1311-1315.
  • 7Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 1990, 10: 244-251.
  • 8Swinhoe CF, Peacock JE, Glen JB, et al. Evaluation of the pre-dictive performance of a "Diprifusor" TCI system. Anaesthesia,1998, 53(Suppl) : 61-67.
  • 9Coetzee JF, Glen JB, Wium CA, et al. Pharmacokinetic model selection for target controlled infusions of propofol. Anesthesiology,1995, 82: 1328-1345.
  • 10Struys MM, Smet TD, Depoorter B, et al. Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartment-controlled target-controlled infusion for propofol. Anesthesiology, 2000, 92:399-406.

共引文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部