期刊文献+

异丙酚Graseby3500与TCI-Ⅰ靶控输注时对患者血流动力学的影响 被引量:2

Haemodynamics difference of different target controlled infusion systems between Graseby3500 and TCI-Ⅰ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较不同靶控输注系统Graseby3500与TCI-Ⅰ对患者血流动力学的影响。方法选择30例ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级并符合纳入标准的支撑喉镜下声带息肉切除术病人,随机均分为2组,A组:Graseby3500;B组:TCI-Ⅰ。入室后行肘静脉穿刺置管建立静脉通道,在30min内输入10ml/kg复方乳酸林格氏液生理需要量后,选用阿斯利康Propofol Injection(Diprivan)50ml行靶控输注,血浆药物浓度设为3μg/ml,靶控开始后1分钟静注咪唑安定0.08mg/kg,芬太尼5μg/kg,司可林1mg/kg诱导插管,靶控输注20分钟。记录靶控开始及靶控停止后2.5、5、7.5、10、15、20min时的心率、呼末CO2分压、无创血压、手术时间,阿托品及麻黄素的使用例数,靶控期间输液量、手术出血量及腋温。结果两组患者的手术时间、异丙酚总用量、阿托品及麻黄素使用例数、靶控期间输液量及手术出血量无统计学差异(P〉0.05)。靶控输注前两组患者心率、血压、呼末CO2分压无差异(P〉0.05);靶控开始后2.5、5、7.5、10min时A组心率明显低于B组(P〈0.035),血压、呼末CO2分压无差异(P〉0.05);靶控开始后15、20min及靶控停止后2.5、5、7.5、10、15、20min心率、呼末CO2分压及无创血压无明显差异。结论国产异丙酚TCI-Ⅰ靶控输注系统较Graseby3500系统对患者靶控输注早期心率影响较小,有可能是二者实际血浆药物浓度差异造成。靶控输注前一定的容量支持对血压的稳定有着积极的作用。 Objective To compare haemodynamics variations of different target-controlled infusion(TCI) systems between Graseby3500 and TCI-Ⅰapplied in patients.Method 30 ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients undergoing polyp of cord ectomy under pedestal laryngoscope were studied.30 patients were randomly allocated to two groups including A group(Graseby3500) And B group(TCI-Ⅰ).Lactated Ringer's solution as consistent with 10ml/kg·hour was infused within 30 min before TCI.The propofol plasma concentration of TCI was set at 3μg/ml and infusion time last 20min.1 min after TCI,the patients were infused midazolam 0.08mg/kg,fentanyl 5μg /kg and succinylcholine 1mg/kg to facilitate tracheal incubation.If HR was lower than 55/min or NBP was lower than 60/30mmHg,atropine 0.25mg or ephedrine 6mg was infused respectively.SBP,DBP,MBP,HR,etCO2,and armpit-temperature were continuously monitored and recorded during TCI and 20 minutes after TCI.Results At the time of 2.5,5,7.5 and 10min after target-controlled infusion,HR in A group was obviously lower(than that in B groupP0.035).No difference was found between two groups about SBP,DBP,MBP,et CO2,and armpit-temperature.Conclusion TCI-Ⅰsystem exhibited less influence on HR during early TCI than Graseby 3500 system.Certain degree of volume support may play a positive role in the stability of blood pressure prior to TCI.
出处 《西部医学》 2011年第6期1107-1109,共3页 Medical Journal of West China
关键词 靶控输注 Graseby3500 TCIⅠ血流动力学 Target-controlled infusion Graseby3500 TCIⅠ Hemodynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1郑宏,王江,曹兴华,芮建中,刘进.国人靶控输注异丙酚的群体药代动力学[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(5):332-334. 被引量:43
  • 2Wehimann T, Kokabpick S, Lembeks B,et al. Efficacy and safe- ty of intravenous propofol sedation during routine ERCP.. a pro- spective controlled study[J]. Gastrointest Endose, 1999,49 (6) : 667-683.
  • 3Mash B, White M , Morton N. et al. Pharmaeokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children[J]. Br J Anesth, 1991,67 : 41-48.
  • 4Sharer SL, Siegel LC, Cooke James, et al. Testing computer-con- trolled infusion pumps by simulation[J]. Anesthesiology, 1998,89 (6) :1418-1429.
  • 5Vuyk J,Engbers FHM, Burro AGL, et al. Performance of com- puter-controlled infusion of propofol i an evaluation of five phar- maeokinetic parameter sets[J]. Anesth Analg, 1995,81(6) : 1275.
  • 6Coetzee JF,Glen JB,W ium CA. et al. Pharmacokinetic model se- lection foe target controlled of propofol [J]. Anesthesiology, 1995,82(6) :1328-1345.
  • 7Tackley RM, Lewis GTR, Prys-Roberts C, et al. Computer-con- trolled infusion of propofol[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1989,6(1) :46-53.

二级参考文献1

  • 1Tackley RM, Lewis GTR, Roberts CP, et al. Computer controlled infusion of propofol. Br J Anaesth, 1989,62 : 46-53.

共引文献42

同被引文献34

  • 1何毅,苏翠萍.丙泊酚复合曲马多用于无痛人工流产术200例临床分析[J].新疆医学,2011,41(S1):31-32. 被引量:1
  • 2徐志荣,方能新,钱梅,张健,曾一平.雷米芬太尼复合丙泊酚用于无痛人流的临床观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(3):202-203. 被引量:49
  • 3潘韫丹,郭曲练,钟涛.CSI在成人靶控输注异丙酚麻醉诱导中的监测及评价[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2006,31(3):437-440. 被引量:18
  • 4何志龙,周振苇,黄猛.无痛人流术中丙泊酚靶控输注的临床观察[J].广东医学,2007,28(1):120-121. 被引量:8
  • 5Ellett ML.A literature review of the safety and efficacy of using propofol for sedation in endoscopy[J].Gastroenterol Nurs,2010,33(2):111-117.
  • 6Lee MH,Yang KH,Lee CS,et al.The effect-site concentration of propofol producing respiratory depression during spinal anesthesia[J].Korean J Anesthesiol,2011,61(2):122-126.
  • 7Thaharavanich R,Sintavanuruk K,Laosuwan S,et al.Predicted EC50 of propofol using target controlled infusion with and without fentanyl for colonoscopy[J].J Med Assoc Thai,2011,94(7):813-818.
  • 8Wu W,Chen Q,Zhang LC,et al.Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy[J].J Int Med Res,2014.
  • 9Ogawa S,Seino H,Ito H,et al.Intravenous sedation with low-dose dexmedetomidine:its potential for use in dentistry[J].Anesth Prog,2008,55(3):82-88.
  • 10Kasuya Y,Govinda R,Rauch S,et al.The correlation between bispectral index and observational sedation scale in volunteers sedated with dexmedetomidine and propofol[J].Anesth Analg,2009,109(6):1811-1815.

引证文献2

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部