期刊文献+

留守儿童解释偏向的跨情境比较研究 被引量:1

Cross-situational Comparative Study on Interpretation Bias in Left-behind Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解留守儿童在一般同伴和亲密好友社交情境下的解释偏向特点。方法选取320名留守儿童为研究组,276名普通儿童为控制组,施测儿童版两可社交情境解释问卷。结果留守儿童的消极解释偏向显著高于控制组(t=2.52,P<0.05),积极解释偏向显著低于控制组(t=-4.21,P<0.001);留守儿童指向自身的消极解释偏向显著高于控制组(t=2.66,P<0.01;t=3.58,P<0.001);留守儿童在亲密好友情境比在一般同伴情境下更少产生消极解释(t=5.77,P<0.001),更多地产生积极解释(t=-4.19,P<0.001)。结论留守儿童存在明显的消极解释偏向,缺乏积极解释偏向;好友关系在一定程度上抑制消极解释并促进积极解释的产生。 Objective To explore the features of interpretation bias in left-behind children in unfamiliar peer and good friend condition.Methods The Ambiguous Social Situation Interpretation Questionnaire for children were used in a sample of 320 left-behind children and 276 normal children.Results Compared with normal children,left-behind children had significantly more negative and less positive interpretation bias(t=2.52,P0.05;t=-4.21,P0.001);left-behind children had significantly more internal negative interpretation than normal children(t=2.66,P0.01;t=3.58,P0.001);left-behind children generated less negative(t=5.77,P0.001),more positive interpretation(t=-4.19,P0.001)in good friend condition compared to unfamiliar peer condition.Conclusion Left-behind children display obvious negative interpretation bias,lack positive interpretation;friendship can make negative interpretation reduced and positive interpretation increased to some extent.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2011年第6期720-721,共2页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 解释偏向 比较研究 留守儿童 Interpretation bias Comparative study Left-behind children
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Vassilopoulos SP,Banerjee R. Interpretations and judgments regarding Positive and negative social scenarios in childhood social anxiety [J].Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2008,46 : 870-876.
  • 2Murphy R,Hirsch C R,Mathews A,et al. Facilitating a benign interpretation bias in a high socially anxious Population [J].Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2007,45:1517 -1529.
  • 3黄爱玲.“留守孩”心理健康水平分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(5):351-351. 被引量:163
  • 4罗静,王薇,高文斌.中国留守儿童研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(5):990-995. 被引量:232
  • 5范兴华,方晓义,刘勤学,刘杨.流动儿童、留守儿童与一般儿童社会适应比较[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2009(5):33-40. 被引量:188
  • 6王晓丹,陈旭.留守儿童与非留守儿童社交焦虑及认知偏差的比较研究[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2010,37(2):57-61. 被引量:35
  • 7Kim B B, Julie C W,Kenneth H R,et al. Social Information Processing and Coping Strategies of Shy/Withdrawn and Aggressive Children: Does Friendship Matter[J]. Child Development, 2006,77:371-383.
  • 8Butler G,Mathews A. Cognitive Processes in anxiety[J].Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1983,5 : 51- 62.
  • 9Jonathan D H,Edna B F,Jami M F,et al. Interpreation Bias in social anxiety:A dimensional Perspective [J]. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2003,27 :569-577.
  • 10Hirsch C R,Mathews A. Impaired Positive inferential bias in social Phobia[J].Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2000,109 : 705-712.

二级参考文献74

共引文献696

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部