期刊文献+

T-CEMD方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤的临床研究 被引量:1

The Clinicl Study of T-CEMD Regimen in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨T-CEMD方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的临床疗效和不良反应。方法 22例复发难治性MM患者应用T-CEMD方案:沙利度胺100mg,每晚1次;环磷酰胺500mg/m2,第1天;足叶乙甙70mg/m2,第1~2天;米托蒽醌4mg/m2,第1~3天;地塞米松40 mg第1~4天;21d为一个疗程。19例初治MM用T-CEMD与VAD类方案交替(T-CEMD/VAD)治疗;18例初治MM单用VAD类方案治疗。结果 在22例难治性MM患者中,完全缓解(CR)8例(36%)、部分缓解(PR)12例(55%)、无效(NR)2例(9%),总有效率(ORR)91%。T-CEMD/VAD方案治疗的19例中,CR 6例(32%)、PR11例(58%)、NR 2例,总有效率(ORR)90%。单用VAD类方案治疗18例初治MM者中,CR 1例(6%)、PR 8例(44%),ORR50%。T-CEMD方案的主要不良反应为骨髓抑制。结论 T-CEMD方案对复发难治性MM患者中的补救治疗,具有较为理想的疗效。T-CEMD/VAD交替方案治疗初治MM患者,明显优于单用VAD类方案。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and adverse effects of T-CEMD regimen in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Methods Twenty-two patients with refractory or relapsed MM were treated by T-CEMD regimen;19 patients with MM were treated by T-CEMD/VAD regimen;18 patients with MM were treated by VAD like regimen. Results Out of 22 patients with refractory or relapsed MM were treated by T-CEMD regimen,8 achieved CR,12 achieved CR,ORR were 91%(20/22);Out of 19 patients with MM were treated by T-CEMD/VAD regimen,6 achieved CR,11 achieved CR,ORR were 90%(17/19);Out of 18 patients with MM were treated by VAD like regimen,1 achieved CR,8achieved CR,ORR were 50%(9/18). The main toxicities of T-CEMD regimen Were marrow depressed. Conclusion The T-CEMD regimen is more effective treatment to patients with refractory or relapsed MM; The T-CEMD/VAD regimen is an very effective way as induction treatment in new-diagnosed MM.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2011年第18期67-68,72,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 药物疗法 联合 Multiple myeloma Drug therapy Combination
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献52

  • 1麦玉洁,李睿,邹德慧,王亚非,赵耀中,杨仁池,王建祥,肖志坚,韩明哲,钱林生,邱录贵.206例多发性骨髓瘤患者不同方案疗效分析[J].中华血液学杂志,2005,26(4):193-196. 被引量:37
  • 2Leonard T, Heffner JR, Sagar L. Breakthroughs in the management of multiple myeloma. Drugs, 2003, 63: 1621-1636.
  • 3Paz-Ares L, Gore ME, Cuningham D, et al. High dose melphalan for multiple myeloma-long term follow up data. J Clin Oncol, 1994, 12: 764-765.
  • 4Kumar S, Gertz MA, Dispenzie ri A, et al. Response rate,durability of response,and survival after thalidomide therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma. Med Oncol, 2003, 78: 34-39.
  • 5Hideshima T, Chauhan D, Shima Y, et al. Thalidomide and its analogs overcome drug resistance of human multiple myeloma ceils to conventional therapy. Blood, 2000, 96: 2943-2950.
  • 6Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in muhiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome [see comments]. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335: 91-97.
  • 7Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med, 2003, 348: 1875-1883.
  • 8Fermand JP, Katsahian S, Divine M, et al. High-dose therapy and autologous blood stem -cell transplantation compared with conventional treatment in myeloma patients aged 55 to 65 years: long-term results of a randomized control trial from the Group Myelome-Autogreffe. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23: 9227-9233.
  • 9Blade J, Rosinol L, Sureda A, et al. High-dose therapy intensification compared with continued standard chemotherapy in multiple myeloma patients responding to the initial chemotherapy: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial from the Spanish cooperative group PETHEMA. Blood, 2005, 106: 3755- 3759.
  • 10Barlogie B, Kyle RA, Anderson KC, et al. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24: 929-936.

共引文献5

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部