期刊文献+

颅内动脉瘤介入术全静脉复合麻醉中应用瑞芬太尼的分析

Application of Remifentanil in Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Intracranial Aneurysm Intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察异丙酚、瑞芬太尼全静脉麻醉在颅内动脉瘤介入术的麻醉效果。方法选择ASA分级I~Ⅱ级颅内动脉瘤患者58例,随机分为瑞芬太尼组(R组)、芬太尼组(F组)各29例,记录两组在麻醉诱导及气管插管前后各时段血压、心率、血氧饱和度、呼气末二氧化碳浓度变化、术毕患者自主呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔管时间、拔管时躁动情况及术后并发症。结果 F组血压、心率值在插管即刻、插管后5min较基础值上升但无显著性差异(P>0.05),R组则下降(P<0.05);两组比较差异显著(P<0.05);两组麻醉维持阶段循环血流动力学稳定,R组术后自主呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔管时间均明显短于F组(P<0.05)。结论异丙酚和瑞芬太尼全静脉麻醉诱导平稳,血流动力学稳定,麻醉效果优于芬太尼。 Objective To observe the effects of remifentanil in total intravenous anesthesia for intracranial aneurysm intervention. Methods Fifty-eight cases ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ undergoing intracranial aneusm intervention were randomly divided into two groups:Remifentanil group (R)and Fentanyl group (F)29 cases.in esch The change of blood pressure,heart rate,oxygen saturation of functional hemoglobin (SpO2),end expiration CO2 were observed;and the time of spontaneously breathing,eyes opening and restlessness at extubation,and postoperative complications at anesthesia induction and tracheal extubation WBS also were recorded. Results There was no significant difference at tracheal intubation immediately after anesthesia induction and 5mins after tmcheal intubation in F group (P〉0.05),but it was opposite in group R (P〈0.05). The time of spontaneously breathing recovery,eyes opening,extubation was obviously shorter in R group than that in F group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Propofol and remifentanil with total intravenous anesthesia are more stable during anesthesia induction,its hemodynamics is more steady palinesthesia is better and it's effects is superior to Fentanyl.
作者 杨红敏
出处 《中国现代医生》 2011年第18期146-147,共2页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 瑞芬太尼 异丙酚 颅内动脉瘤介入术 Remifentanil Propofol Intracranial anenrysm intervention
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献22

  • 1赵高峰,张兴安,施冲,吴群林,徐波.靶控输注异丙酚复合瑞芬太尼或芬太尼全静脉麻醉[J].广东医学,2004,25(7):765-767. 被引量:103
  • 2林霖,王伟鹏,张燕婉,刘进.两种剂量芬太尼对冠状动脉旁路移植术患者血液动力学及血浆儿茶酚胺的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(6):460-461. 被引量:23
  • 3李晓松,路红梅,刘雅.静吸复合麻醉用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术时雷米芬太尼与芬太尼的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(3):201-202. 被引量:51
  • 4Engelhard K, Reeker W, Kochs E, et al. Effect of remifentanil on intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity in patients with head trauma. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2004,48:396.
  • 5Guy J, Hindman B J, Baker KZ, et al. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupuing lesions. Anethesiology, 1997,86:514.
  • 6Sear JW. Recent advances and developments in the clinical use of i.v. opioids during the perioperative period. Br J Anaesth, 1998,81(1):38.
  • 7Conti A, Iacopino DG, Fodale V, et al. Cerebral haemodynamic changes during propofol-remifentanil or sevoflurane anaesthesia: transcranial Doppler study under bispectral index monitoring. Br J Anaesth, 2006,97(3):333.
  • 8Bilotta F, Caramia R, Paoloni FP, et al. Early postoperative cognitive recovery after remifentanil-propofol or sufentanil-propofol anaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy: a randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2006,23(8):1.
  • 9Lequeux PY, Velghe Lenelle CE, Cantraine F, et al. Absence of implicit and explicit memory during propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia. Eur J Anaestb, 2005,22:333.
  • 10Degoute CS.Controlled hypotension:a guide to drugchoice[J].Drugs,2007,67(7):1 053-1 076.

共引文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部