期刊文献+

结肠癌腹腔镜下切除与开腹切除的短期疗效对比 被引量:16

Short Term Therapeutic Effect of Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较结肠癌腹腔镜辅助下切除与开腹切除的短期疗效。方法对2004年1月~2009年12月笔者所在医院行腹腔镜辅助下结肠癌根治术30例及开腹结肠癌根治术45例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,比较两组患者手术及术后情况。结果腹腔镜组与开腹组手术时间分别为(150.45±22.10)min和(148.56±28.55)min;切口总长度分别为(6.55±0.54)cm和(18.56±2.35)cm;出血量分别为(33.52±23.08)mL和(40.35±25.12)mL;淋巴结清除数分别为(12.53±2.36)枚和(13.24±2.05)枚;术后镇痛时间分别为(49.00±2.30)min和(89.00±9.30)min;术后下床活动时间分别为(30.85±7.09)min和(72.25±9.73)min;术后平均住院天数(6.05±1.09)d和(10.06±2.16)d;术后肛门排气时间分别为(25.08±6.89)min和(66.28±13.57)min;两组患者病理切缘均为阴性,均无术后并发症及术后死亡病例。结论腹腔镜辅助下结肠癌根治术安全可行,具有患者创伤小、术后康复快的优点,根治效果可达到开腹手术的水平。 Objective To investigate the feasibility and short term therapeutic effect of laparoscopic for colon cancer.Methods The clinical data of 30 cases underwent laparoscopic hemicolectomy for colon cancer and 45 cases underwent open hemicolectomy for colon cancer from January 2004 to December 2009 was retrospectively analyzed.Results The mean operative time of laparoscopic group and open group wa(s150.45±22.10)min an(d148.56±28.55) min.The incision length of laparoscopic group was obviously shorter than that of open grou(p6.55±0.54)cm an(d18.56±2.35)cm,and the operative blood loss of laparoscopic group and open group wa(s33.52±23.08)mL an(d40.35±25.12)mL obviously,there was no significant difference between the number of cleared lymph node(s12.53±2.36)and(13.24±2.05).The gastrointestinal function of laparoscopic group recoveredmore quickly than open grou(p25.08±6.89)min an(d66.28±13.57)min.The postoperative hospital day was shorter in laparoscopic group than open group(6.05±1.09)d and (10.06±2.16)d.And after all,there were no different in postoperative complications,postoperative death.Conclusion The laparoscopic hemicolectomy for colon cancer was safe and effective.It has advantages of less pain and trauma,earlier postoperative recovery,and similar radical effect as laparotomy.
作者 郭世强 丁瑛
出处 《中国医药科学》 2011年第10期22-23,32,共3页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 结肠癌 腹腔镜 结肠癌根治术 对比研究 Colonic cancer Laparoscopy Hemicolectomy Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1郑民华,冯波.从循证医学谈腹腔镜与开腹结直肠癌手术的比较[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(11):676-678. 被引量:37
  • 2牟一平,杨鹏,严加费,陈其龙,袁晓明,朱玲华,徐晓武.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床疗效评估[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(9):581-583. 被引量:83
  • 3申占龙,王秋生,刘隆,董雷,周东海.腹腔镜辅助或手助结直肠癌根治术[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(7):513-515. 被引量:23
  • 4Lezoche E,Feliciotti F,Paganini AM,et al.Laparoscopic vs open hemicolectomy for colon cancer.Surg Endosc,2002,16:596-602.
  • 5Champault GG,Barrat C,Raselli R,et al.Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma:a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years.Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2002,12:88-95.
  • 6Lacy AM,Garcia-Valdecasas JC,Delgado S,et al.Laparoscopy assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:a randomized trial.Lancet,2002,359(9325):2224-2229.
  • 7Kitano S,Shiraishi N.Minimally invasive surgery for gastric tumors[J].Surg Clin North Am,2005; 85(1):151.
  • 8Heemskerk J,van Gemert WG,Greve JW,et al.Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication:a comparative retrospective study on costs and time consumption[J].Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech,2007; 17(1):1.
  • 9DeNoto G,Rubach E,Ravikumar TS.A standardized technique for robotically performed sigmoid colectomy[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2006; 16(6):551.
  • 10Rockall TA,Darzi A.Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery[J].Surg Clin North Am,2003; 83(6):1463.

共引文献61

同被引文献202

引证文献16

二级引证文献258

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部