摘要
黔东南州从江县高增与増冲两个侗族村寨相隔80多公里,历史上分属不同的款组织(大款),在几乎同一时间立下内容相近的款碑,是非常有意思并值得研究的问题。这两通款碑是清初时期侗族小地域社会历史的物证,史料价值非常珍贵。但由于以前的研究者没有实地调查,对两者的关系未加注意,所录两通款碑(主要是后者)或有内容多处混淆者,或因不够仔细,抄录不准,文字歧异者。笔者提出问题并尽量厘定,以防今后以讹传讹,同时,通过这两通款碑探讨侗族的款组织大款合款定立款约等问题。
The two the Dong villages of Gaozeng and zengchong of Congjiang County in Qiandongnan are 80 km away and they belong to different organizations (Dakuan) historically, but they set the formal monuments including the similar contents in almost the same time, it is very interesting and worthwhile Study. The two section of formal monuments are the physical evidence of small regional social history of The Dongs' in the early period of Qing Dinasty and its historical value is very precious. However, without field surveys, previous researchers did not notice the relationship between the two formal monuments and their recording (mainly the latter) of the contents was confused, or without enough details or not exact. The author determines to ask reaise questions and tries to prevent future repeated the baseless assertion. At the same time, the paper explores issuess such as establishing contracts by the Dongs' organization (Dakuan) through the study of the two formal monument.
出处
《贵州民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第3期46-52,共7页
Guizhou Ethnic Studies
关键词
高增
增冲
款碑
大款合款
“款约”
Gaozeng, zengchong, formal monuments, dakuan, contracts of the Dongs' organization