期刊文献+

恶性骨肿瘤活检安全性评估 被引量:6

The safety evaluation of biopsy in malignant bone tumors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究恶性骨肿瘤穿刺及切开活检道后被肿瘤污染的发生率及活检的安全性。方法选取2005年7月至2007年10月恶性骨肿瘤行穿刺活检后的病理标本48例,男37例,女11例;年龄10-64岁,平均23.3岁;骨肉瘤37例,恶性纤维组织细胞瘤5例,皮质旁骨肉瘤1例,髓内高分化骨肉瘤1例,骨膜骨肉瘤1例,骨原发恶性黑色素瘤1例,软骨肉瘤2例。活检至再次手术间隔0-2个月,平均1-3个月;均行保肢治疗。选取同期行切开活检病理标本26例,男21例,女5例;年龄8-59岁,平均21.9岁;骨肉瘤20例,Ewing肉瘤1例,软骨肉瘤2例,间叶性软骨肉瘤1例,恶性纤维组织细胞瘤1例,淋巴瘤1例。活检至再次手术间隔1-4个月,平均2.3个月。活检道的手术切除范围均为其内外各2cm,连同瘤段整块切除。对活检道途经的组织取材,以病理为标准判断活检道途经的组织有无恶性肿瘤污染,并确定被肿瘤污染的发生率及范围。结果48例穿刺活检患者中44例获得随访,随访时间4-39个月,平均17.6个月。4例(4/48,8.3%)活检道存在恶性肿瘤种植污染。末次随访时,4例发生非活检道肿瘤复发。26例切开活检患者均获得随访,随访时间2-29个月,平均12.9个月。2例活检道病理可见肿瘤,阳性率为7.7%(2/26)。末次随访时,3例发生非活检道肿瘤复发。结论恶性骨肿瘤进行穿刺活检和切开活检虽存在活检道被肿瘤污染的危险,但在最终手术时活检道连同肿瘤一同切除后不会发生因活检而造成的肿瘤复发。 Objective To investigate the incidence and extent of biopsy tract contamination in malignant bone tumors by either core needle biopsy or open biopsy and detect the safe extent in resection of biopsy tract. Methods Forty-eight cases were performed core needle biopsy, including 37 osteosarcomas, 5 malignant fibrous histiocytomas, 1 juxtacortical osteosarcoma, 1 low grade central osteosarcoma, 1 periosteal osteosarcoma, 1 primary malignant melanoma of bone and 2 chondrosarcomas. There were 37 males and 11 females with a mean age of 23.3 years (range, 10-64 years). The mean time between core needle biopsy and definitive surgery was 1.3 months (range, 0-2 months). All the patients were performed limb salvage surgery. Twenty-six cases were performed open biopsy, including 20 osteosarcomas, 1 Ewing's sarcoma, 2 chondrosarcomas, 1 mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, 1 malignant fibrous histiocytoma, 1 lymphoma. There were 21 males and 5 females with a mean age of 21.9 years (range, 8-59 years). The mean time between open biopsy and definitive surgery was 2.3 months (range, 1-4 months). The tumor and tissue around the biopsy tract at least 2 cm were resected. The pathological examination was performed in specimens via the biopsy tract, including the normal soft tissue outside the tumor, deep fascia, subcutaneous tissue and skin. The incidence and extent of biopsy tract contamination were evaluated with pathological examination. Results Forty-four cases were followed up. The mean follow-up time was 17.6 months (range, 4-39 months). In core needle biopsy group, four of forty-eight cases were found malignant tumor cells seeding in biopsy tract, the positive rate was 8.3%. In open biopsy group, all the cases were followed up with the mean time of 12.9 months (range, 2-29 months), and two of twenty-six cases were found malignant tumor cells seeding in biopsy tract, the positive rate was 7.7%. Conclusion Biopsy of malignant bone tumors has the risk of biopsy tract contamination. The tumor cell seeding exists in both core needle biopsy and open biopsy. The biopsy tract should be performed en bloc resection with the tumor.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期676-680,共5页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
关键词 骨肿瘤 活组织检查 肿瘤种植 肿瘤复发 局部 Bone Neoplasms Biopsy Neoplasm seeding Neoplasm recurrence, local
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. Current concepts review: the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1980, 62(6):1027-1030.
  • 2Simon MA, Biermann JS. Biopsy of bone and soft-tissue lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1993, 75:616-621.
  • 3Gerster AG. On the surgical dissemination of cancer. Ann Surg, 1885, 2(8): 98-109.
  • 4Ryall C. Cancer infection and cancer recurrence: a danger to avoid in cancer operations. Lancet, 1907, 2: 1311-1316.
  • 5Welker JA, Henshaw RM, Jelinek J, et al. The percutaneous nee- die biopsy is safe and recommended in the diagnosis of muscu- loskeletal masses. Cancer, 2000, 89(12):2677-2656.
  • 6Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review. Radiology, 1991, 178(1):253-258.
  • 7Schwartz HS, Spengler DM. Needle tract recurrences after closed biopsy for sarcoma: three cases and review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol, 1997, 4(3): 228-236.
  • 8Silva MA, Hega B, Hyde C, et al. Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut,2005,57(11):1592-1596.
  • 9Joynt GH, Ortved WE. The accidental operative transplantation of benign giant cell tumor. Ann Surg, 1948, 127(6):1232-1239.
  • 10Ayala AG, Raymond AK, Ro JY, et al. Needle biopsy of primary bone lesions. M.D. Anderson experience. Pathol Annu, 1989, 24 Pt 1: 219-251.

同被引文献26

  • 1李亚英,李绍会,任燕山,韩锡铁,先正元.软骨母细胞瘤的影像学诊断(附5例分析)[J].遵义医学院学报,2006,29(3):281-283. 被引量:2
  • 2李建武,白梅,王军,王臻,白国玺,李占宁.髓内固定技术在骨肿瘤保肢手术中的应用及生物力学分析[J].临床误诊误治,2007,20(6):14-17. 被引量:5
  • 3Okada K, Frassica FJ, Sire FH, et al. Parosteal osteosarcoma. A clinicopatho- logical study[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1994,76(3) :366-378.
  • 4Enneking WF, Springfield D, Gross M. The surgical treatment of parosteal osteo- sarcoma in long bones [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1985,67 ( 1 ) : 125-135.
  • 5Tempel HT, Scully SP, O'Keefe R J, et al. Clinical outcome of 38 patients with juxtacortical osteosarcoma[J]. Clin Or- thop ,2000, (373) :208-217.
  • 6Guhekin E, Guhekin OE, Cingillioglu B,et al. The value of frozen section evaluation in the management of border- line ovarian tumors [J]. J Cancer Res Ther,2011,7(4): 416-420.
  • 7Dupuy DE,Rosenberg AE,Punyaratabandhu T,et al.Ac- curacy of CT-guided needle biopsy musculoskeletal neo- plasms[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 1998,171:759-762.
  • 8Bui MM,Smith P,Agresta SV,et aL Practical issues of in- traoperative frozen section diagnosis of bone and soft tis- sue lesions[J].Cancer Control,2008,15( 1 ) :7-12.
  • 9Brun JL,Cortez A,Rouzier R,et al. Factors influencing the use and accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of ep- ithelial ovarian tumors[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2008, 199(3) :244.el-7.
  • 10Simon MA,Finn HA. Diagnostic strategy for bone and soft-tissue tumors [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1993,75: 622-631.

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部