期刊文献+

The effect of surface roughness on claw and adhesive hair performance in the dock beetle Gastrophysa viridula 被引量:6

The effect of surface roughness on claw and adhesive hair performance in the dock beetle Gastrophysa viridula
原文传递
导出
摘要 Natural adhesive systems are adapted to attach to rough surfaces, but the underlying mechanisms have not been fully clarified. Attachment forces for the beetle Gastrophysa viridula were recorded on epoxy casts of surfaces with different roughness using a centrifuge device. Replicas were made of standardized polishing paper with asperity sizes ranging from 0.05 to 30 μm and of dock leaves (Rumex obtusifolius). Beetles adhered with a safety factor of up to 36 times body weight on smooth substrates or on casts of leaves of their host plant. On the rough substrates, forces were much lower and a minimum at small scale roughness (0.05μm asperity size, with a mean safety factor of S) was observed. Removal of the claws led to a significant reduction in force for rough substrates with asperity sizes ≥ 12 μm. Attachment forces of the hairy adhesive system itself(without the claws) slightly increased from small-scale to large-scale surface roughness, but remained below the level seen on the smooth substrate. This is explained by the inability of setal tips to make full contact to the surface. Natural adhesive systems are adapted to attach to rough surfaces, but the underlying mechanisms have not been fully clarified. Attachment forces for the beetle Gastrophysa viridula were recorded on epoxy casts of surfaces with different roughness using a centrifuge device. Replicas were made of standardized polishing paper with asperity sizes ranging from 0.05 to 30 μm and of dock leaves (Rumex obtusifolius). Beetles adhered with a safety factor of up to 36 times body weight on smooth substrates or on casts of leaves of their host plant. On the rough substrates, forces were much lower and a minimum at small scale roughness (0.05μm asperity size, with a mean safety factor of S) was observed. Removal of the claws led to a significant reduction in force for rough substrates with asperity sizes ≥ 12 μm. Attachment forces of the hairy adhesive system itself(without the claws) slightly increased from small-scale to large-scale surface roughness, but remained below the level seen on the smooth substrate. This is explained by the inability of setal tips to make full contact to the surface.
机构地区 Department of Zoology
出处 《Insect Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第3期298-304,共7页 昆虫科学(英文版)
关键词 adhesion biomechanics CLAWS locomotion roughness TRIBOLOGY adhesion, biomechanics, claws, locomotion, roughness, tribology
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Asbeck, A.T., Kim, S., Cutkosky, M.R., Provancher, W.R. and Lanzetta, M. (2006) Scaling hard vertical surfaces with compliant microspine arrays. International Journal of Robotics Research, 25, 1165-1179.
  • 2Autumn, K., Majidi, C., Groff, R.E., Dittmore, A. and Fearing, R. (2006) Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 3558-3568.
  • 3Barnes, W.J.P., Smith, J., Oines, C. and Mundl, R. (2002) Bionics and wet grip. Tire Technology International, Dec 2002, 56- 60.
  • 4Betz, O. (2002) Performance and adaptive value of tarsal morphology in rove beetles of the genus Stenus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Journal of Experimental Biology, 205, 1097- 1113.
  • 5Beutel, R.G. and Gorb, S.N. (2001) Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 39, 177- 207.
  • 6Bullock, J.M.R., Drechsler, R and Federle, W. (2008) Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211, 3333 3343.
  • 7Bullock, J.M.R. and Federle, W. (2009) Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212, 1876-1888.
  • 8Dai, Z., Gorb, S.N. and Schwarz, U. (2002) Roughnessdependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Journal of Experimental Biology, 205, 2479-2488.
  • 9Drechsler, P. and Federle, W. (2006) Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: Influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 192, 1213-1222.
  • 10Federle, W. (2006) Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 2611-2621.

同被引文献76

  • 1戴振东,孙久荣.壁虎的运动及仿生研究进展[J].自然科学进展,2006,16(5):519-523. 被引量:23
  • 2戴振东,佟金,任露泉.仿生摩擦学研究及发展[J].科学通报,2006,51(20):2353-2359. 被引量:50
  • 3陈少华,苏爱嘉.生物黏附与仿生黏附力学的进展[J].力学与实践,2007,29(2):9-17. 被引量:9
  • 4温诗铸,黄平.界面科学与技术[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2011.
  • 5Vogel M J, Steen P H. Capillarity based switchable adhesion [ J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 2010, 107(8) : 3-377 3 -381.
  • 6Stork N E. A scanning electron microscope study of tarsal adhesive setae in the Coleoptera [ J]. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1980, 68:173-306.
  • 7Hanna G, Barnes W J P. Adhesion and detachment of the toe pads of tree frogs [ J ]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1991, 155: 103-125.
  • 8Walker G. Adhesion to smooth surfaces by insects: a review [ J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 1993, 13 (1):3 7.
  • 9Autumn K, Liang Y A, Hsieh S T, et al. Adhesive force of a single gecko foot hair [ J]. Nature, 2000, 405:681-685.
  • 10Beutel R G, Gorb S N. Uhrastrncture of attachment specializations of hexapods ( Arthropoda ) : evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny [ J ]. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 2001, 39:177-207.

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部