摘要
文摘数据库以其收录信息全、检索功能强、全文链接、定题跟踪等优势,被图书馆界公认为是系统检索科研信息的首选检索工具,但科研人员却更多地选择Google scholar。文章从信息来源、检索功能等方面对比Googlescholar与文摘数据库,认为文摘数据库仍是系统检索科研信息的首选检索工具,提出通过加强宣传文摘数据库、完善馆藏链接与全文链接、整合电子资源等方式,使更多的科研人员选择文摘数据库。
Abstracts database has been recognized as the preferred tool of information search,but researchers choose Google scholar than abstracts database.By comparing Google scholar with abstracts database from information sources and search function,the authors think that the abstracts database is still the preferred tool of information search.Abstract database will be used by more researchers by strengthening publicity,improving the link of library holding and full text and integrating the electronic resources,etc.
出处
《四川图书馆学报》
CSSCI
2011年第3期60-62,共3页
Journal of The Library Science Society of Sichuan