期刊文献+

发掘数学教材的评价功能——对美国加州小学数学教材的分析与启示 被引量:6

Exploration of the Assessment Function in Mathematics Textbook of Elementary School——Take California Elementary School Mathematics Textbooks for Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对比美国加州小学数学教材可以发现,中国小学数学教材较为忽视教材对学生的评价载体功能,评价方式单一,还没有形成完整的评价结构,教材缺乏学生自评与互评的工具作用.而美国的小学数学教材却有着评价内容较为丰富,评价结构相对完整,评价方式多样,评价标准明确,评价目的鲜明等诸多特点.5点启示是:应树立评价意识;构建中国教材中的评价结构;创新评价方式;重视《数学课程标准》的指导作用;正确认识教材中评价的功能. Analyze the elementary mathematics textbooks of the U.S.,Chinese primary mathematics textbooks seriously neglect the function of assess of textbook.Exactly,the assessment ways are quite simple and the assessment system is absent,thus,the textbooks are likely to lose the function of self-assessment and peer-assessment for the students.Whereas the primary mathematics textbooks of the U.S.are rich in assessment design.Besides,the other advantages include:the assessment system is complete;the assessment ways are diverse;the assessment standards are definite and the assessment goals are clear,etc.This paper aims to explore five improvements:the importance of assessment should be focused on;the assessment system should be developed;the assessment ways should be improved;the guidance of the curriculum criterion of mathematics should be valued and the function of assessment should be known.
作者 霍雨佳 黄翔
出处 《数学教育学报》 北大核心 2011年第3期76-79,共4页 Journal of Mathematics Education
基金 全国教育科学“十一五”规划2010年度教育部重点课题——新课改十年数学课堂的变化研究(GOA107012)
关键词 小学数学 教材 评价 功能 primary school textbook assessment function
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献11

  • 1张建伟,陈琦.简论建构性学习和教学[J].教育研究,1999,20(5):56-60. 被引量:287
  • 2董奇.论元认知[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1989(1):68-74. 被引量:523
  • 3Minnesota Department of Education. Minnesota Academic Standards Mathematics K-12 May 19, 2003 [S]. 2003: 1-50.
  • 4Minnesota Department of Education. Minnesota Academic Standards Mathematics K-12 2007 version [S]. 2007: 1-45.
  • 5David Klein, Bastiaan J Braams, Thomas Parker, et al. Technical assistance from Ralph A. Raimi and Lawrence Braden Analysis by Justin Torres Foreword by Chester E. Finn, Jr. 2005 The State of State MATH Standards [S]. 2005: 5-127.
  • 6Minnesota Department of Education. Frequently Asked Questions about the 2007 Minnesota Mathematics Standards and Benchmarks for Grades K-12 [Z]. 2007: 1-5.
  • 7Chester E Finn JR, Michael J Petrilli. 2006 The State of State Standards [S]. 2006: 79.
  • 8Minnesota Department of Education. Comments on the April 14, 2007 Draft of Revision of Minnesota Academic Standards in Mathematics [Z]. 2007: 1-6.
  • 9吕传汉,汪秉彝.论中小学“数学情境与提出问题”的数学学习[J].数学教育学报,2001,10(4):9-14. 被引量:151
  • 10周若虹,吕传汉.学生提出数学问题能力的评价[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002,20(2):24-30. 被引量:21

共引文献101

同被引文献67

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部