期刊文献+

产业组织视角下零售商通道费行为 被引量:2

Slotting Allowance Behavior of Retailers in the Perspective of Industrial Organization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将一次性支付的通道费与产业链产量相联系,利用斯坦尔伯格博弈逻辑考察零售商通道费行为与上下游厂商谈判势力的关系以及该行为对于产业链效率的影响.研究结果表明,零售商通道费行为可以改善产业链效率,具体表现为零售商利润与产业链总利润随零售商买方势力增强而增加,但供应商收益会受到损害.特别地,零售商可以选择通道费策略以使产业链利润始终保持在纵向一体化水平,而上下游厂商的利润分配由零售商买方势力外生决定.总体来看,零售商通道费行为作用下的均衡结果优于Spengler双重加价模型,对产业链效率、消费者剩余和社会福利有利. A model which connects lump sum slotting fee and industrial output was built to study the relationship between the retailer's buyer power and its slotting allowance behavior.The effects of slotting allowance behavior on the efficiency of the industrial chain were analyzed using Stackelberg game logic.The results showed that the retailer's slotting allowance behavior can improve the industrial chain efficiency.The retailer's profit and the total industrial chain profit will be enhanced with the increased retailer's buyer power.However,this will harm the manufacturer's profit.The retailer can choose a special form of slotting allowance to maximize the industrial chain efficiency to the vertical integration level.The distribution of profit between the manufacturer and the retailer will be exogenously decided by the retailer's buy power.Comparing with the Spengler's model,the retailer's slotting allowance behavior will benefit the total industry efficiency,the consumer surplus and the social welfare as a whole.
作者 陈浩 李凯
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期895-899,共5页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71003019) 教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(10YJC790004)
关键词 通道费 买方势力 纵向关系 产业链效率 双重加价 slotting allowance buyer power vertical relationship industrial chain efficiency double marginalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Allain M L, Chambolle C. Loss-leaders banning laws as vertical restraints [ J ]. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 2005,3( 1 ) : 1- 24.
  • 2张赞,郁义鸿.零售商垄断势力、通道费与经济规制[J].财贸经济,2006,27(3):60-65. 被引量:52
  • 3Sullivan M. Slotting allowances and the market for new products[J ]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1997,40 (2) : 461 - 493.
  • 4Lariviere M A, Padmanabhan V. Slotting allowances and new product introductions [ J ]. Marketing Science, 1997, 6 ( 2 ) : 112 - 128.
  • 5Shaffer G. Slotting allowances and optimal product variety[J]. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2005,5(1 ) : 1084- 1110.
  • 6Marx L, Shaffer G. Upfront payments and exclusion in upstream markets[ J ]. Rand Journal of Economics, 2007,38 (3) :823 - 843.
  • 7汪浩.通道费与零售商市场力量[J].经济评论,2006(1):29-34. 被引量:72
  • 8Spengler J. Vertical integration and antitrust policy [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1950,58(4) : 347 - 352.

二级参考文献20

  • 1吴小丁.大型零售店“进场费”与“优势地位滥用”规制[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2004,44(5):119-125. 被引量:54
  • 2粲然.民刊的2003[J].新闻周刊,2003(19):52-53. 被引量:3
  • 3于立,吴绪亮.纵向限制的经济逻辑与反垄断政策[J].中国工业经济,2005(8):20-26. 被引量:39
  • 4Bloom, Paul N., 2001. "Role of Slotting Fees and Trade Promotions in Shaping How Tobacco is Marketed in Retail Stores."Tobacco Control, 10, pp. 340 - 344.
  • 5Bloom, Paul N. ; Gtmdlach, Gregory T. and Cannon, Joseph P., 2003."Slotting Allowances and Fees: Schools of Thought and the Views of Practicing Managers. "Journal of Marketing, 64(2), pp.92- 108.
  • 6Chu, Wujin, 1992. "Demand Signaling and Screening in Channels of Distribution. arketmg Smenee, 11 (4), pp. 327-347.
  • 7Deloitte & Touche, 1990. Managing the Process of Introducing and Deleting Products in the Grocery and Drug Industry.Washington, D. C. : Grocery Manufacturers of America.
  • 8Desiraju, Ramarao, 2001. " New Product Introductions,Slotting Allowances, and Retailer Discretion. "Journal of Retailing,77, pp. 335 - 358.
  • 9Farris, Paul W. and Ailawadi, K. L., 1992. "Retailer Power:Monster or Mouse. "Journal of Retailing, 68 (4), pp. 351 - 369.
  • 10Griffith, D. A. and Krampf, R. F., 1997. "Emerging Trends in US Retailing. "Long Range Planning,30, pp. 847- 852.

共引文献94

同被引文献14

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部