期刊文献+

国产比阿培南治疗支气管扩张症合并细菌感染的疗效观察 被引量:13

Observation of curative effect of domestic biapenem on bronchiectasis complicated with bacterial infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价国产比阿培南治疗支气管扩张症合并细菌感染的疗效和安全性。方法将支气管扩张症合并细菌感染患者98例随机分为两组,比阿培南组(n=48)静脉滴注比阿培南,300~600 mg/次,2次/d;对照组(n=50)静脉滴注美罗培南,500~1 000 mg/次,3次/d,疗程均为7~10 d。结果比阿培南组与对照组治疗支气管扩张症合并细菌感染的临床有效率分别为89.58%(43/48)8、4.00%(42/50);细菌清除率分别为92.86%(26/28)、88.24%(30/34),不良反应发生率分别为6.25%(3/48)、10.00%(5/50),两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论国产比阿培南可安全、有效地治疗支气管扩张症合并细菌感染。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of domestic biapenem in the treatment of bronchiectasis complicated with bacterial infections.Methods Ninety-eight patients with bronchiectasis complicated with bacterial infections were randomly divided into two groups:Biapenem group(n=48) which biapenem was administered by intravenous drip infusion at a dose of 300-600 mg twice a day;Control group(n=50) which meropenem was administered by intravenous drip infusion at a dose of 500-1 000 mg three times a day.Their course of treatment both were 7-10 days.Results The clinical effective rate of the biapenem group and the control group were 89.58%(43/48) and 84.00%(42/50),respectively;bacterial eradication rate of them were 92.86%(26/28) and 88.24%(30/34),respectively,and the incidence rates of adverse reactions were 6.25%(3/48) and 10.00%(5/50),respectively.There was no significant difference between two groups(P0.05).Conclusion It is effective and safe to treat bronchiectasis complicated with bacterial infections using domestic biapenem.
作者 覃永 龙胜泽
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第16期1585-1587,共3页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 抗感染药 支气管扩张症 细菌感染 比阿培南 anti-infective agents bronchiectasis bacterial infections biapenem meropenem
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献51

  • 1李家泰,李耘,齐慧敏,代表中国细菌耐药监测研究组.2002—2003年中国革兰阴性细菌耐药性监测研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(1):19-29. 被引量:296
  • 2朱德妹,汪复,张婴元.2003年上海地区细菌耐药性监测[J].中国抗感染化疗杂志,2005,5(1):4-12. 被引量:147
  • 3杨帆,赵旭,吴菊芳,周新,修清玉,施毅,沈策,刘荣玉,张伯科,钟玲,陈楠,倪兆慧,苏炳华,吴湜,张婴元.比阿培南治疗细菌性肺炎和尿路感染的多中心随机对照临床试验[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2007,7(2):73-78. 被引量:28
  • 4Marchese A, Ardito F, Fadda G,et al. The Sentinel Project: an update on the prevalence of antimierobial resistance in community-acquired respiratory Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus spp. In Italy. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2005,26: 8-12.
  • 5Ishii Y, Alba J, Kimura S,et al. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of beta lactam antibiotics using Etest against clinical isolates from 60 medical centres in Japan. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2005,25: 296-301.
  • 6Turner PJ. Trends in antimicrobial susceptibilities among bacterial pathogens isolated from patients hospitalized in European medical centers: 6-year report of the MYSTIC Surveillance Study (1997-2002). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2005,51:281 289.
  • 7Polk RE, Johnson CK, McClish D,et al. Predicting hospital rates of fluoroquinolone-resistaat Pseudomonas aeruginosa from fluoroquinolone use in US hospitals and their surrounding communities. Clin Infect Dis, 2004, 39.- 497-503.
  • 8Sader HS, Jones RN. Antimicrobial susceptibility of uncommonly isolated non-enteric Gram negative bacilli. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2005,25 : 95-109.
  • 9Perry CM,Ibbotson T.Biapenem[J].Drugs,2002,62(15):2 221-2234.
  • 10Sarker SD,Nahar L,Kumarasamy Y.Microtitre plate-based antibacterial assay incorporating resazlnin as an indicator of cell growth,and its application in the in vitro antibacterial screening of phytochcmicals[J].Methods,2007,42:321-324.

共引文献2908

同被引文献115

引证文献13

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部