期刊文献+

马克思与费尔巴哈在自然观上的分歧——从《1844年经济学哲学手稿》来看 被引量:1

Discussion on Different View of Nature between Marx and Feuerbach——From the Perspect of Economy and Philosophy Manuscripts of 1844
下载PDF
导出
摘要 马克思的早期思想深受费尔巴哈的影响,但他对费尔巴哈的唯物主义观点并未完全认可。费尔巴哈由于立足于抽象人本主义和直观的唯物主义,在自然观上坚持自然的本质与人的理性本质的对立,而在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中,马克思立足于工业和实践却认为两者具有统一性。这种分歧源于费尔巴哈在人对自然的关系的理解上停留在感性直观的层面,而马克思则达到了人的感性的对象化活动的层面。这种分歧更为深刻的认识论根源在于两人对黑格尔辩证法的不同理解。 In the earlier period, Marx was deeply effected by Feuerbach's idea, but he didn't approve completely of the materialist viewpoint of Feuerbach. On the basis of the abstract humanism and materialism intuitive,Feuerbach insisted that the essence of the nature and the rational essence of the person were opposite. Based on industry and practice, Marx thought the essence of the nature and the person had unity from Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844. This kind of difference came from Feuerbach's comprehension of the person's relation to the nature. Feuerbach's comprehension still stayed around the sensibility and visual level. However,Marx's comprehension of the person's relation to the nature had reached the level of the object activity of person's sensibility. The deep epistemology source of this kind of difference came from their different comprehension of Hegel's dialectics.
作者 别祖云
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期400-403,共4页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 自然观 辩证法 费尔巴哈 马克思 view of nature dialectics Feuerbaeh Marx
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1恩格斯.路德维希·费尔巴哈和德国古典哲学的终结[M].中央编译局,译.北京:人民出版,1997.13.
  • 2费尔巴哈.宗教的本质[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.46.
  • 3费尔巴哈 荣振华译.基督教的本质[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984.124.
  • 4费尔巴哈.未来哲学原理[M].洪谦,译.北京:三联书店,1955.
  • 5马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].中央编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,2000.

共引文献80

同被引文献10

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部