期刊文献+

两种桡动脉采血方法的对比研究 被引量:1

Two kind of radial arteries pick the blood method the contrast research
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:提高桡动脉穿刺一次成功率,降低血标本凝血发生率,减轻患者痛苦。方法:600例患者随机分为A、B两组,A组采用1ml注射器进行动脉穿刺采血,B组采用2ml注射器连接7号头皮针进行动脉穿刺采血。观察并比较两组桡动脉穿刺采血一次穿刺成功率、标本凝血发生率及患者疼痛程度。结果:A组一次性穿刺成功率明显高于B组(P值〈0.01),A组凝血发生率低于B纽(P值〈0.01),A组患者疼痛程度低于B组(P值〈0.01)。结论:采用1ml注射器进行动脉穿刺相比2ml注射器连接7号头皮针进行动脉采血,能减轻患者的疼痛,降低血标本凝血发生率,提高穿刺率降低,且价格相对便宜,是桡动脉穿刺理想的穿刺方法,值得推广。 Objective:Improve the success rate of gathering blood from the radial artery,to reduce the incidence of coagulation, and reduce the pain of patients. Methods: 600 patients accepting puncturing for blood sample collection from radial artery were ran- domly divided into A and B group. A group used /ml injector and B group used 2ml injector connected No. 7 scalp needle. Then one time puncturing success rate,incidence of coagulation and pain scale were observed and compared. Results: The success rate of A group was much higher than that of B group(P〈0.01). The incidence of coagulation and pain scale of A group were lower than those of B group(P〈0.01). Conclusion:Puncturing the radial artery with lml injector was better than 2ml injector connected No. 7 scalp needle in increasing the success rate of gathering blood, reducing the incidence of coagulation and pain of patients, while it was cheaper. This method is worth to spread
作者 张燕
出处 《按摩与康复医学》 2011年第18期52-53,共2页 Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 桡动脉穿刺 采血 1毫升注射器 The radial artery puncture Picks a blood 1 milliliter injector
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献24

  • 1[1]FISAHMAN B,PASTERNAK S,WALLENSTEIN SL,et al.The memorial pain assessment card[J].Cancer,1987,60:1151- 1158.
  • 2[2]RHIND VM,BIRD NA, WRIGHT V.A comparison of clinical assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis[J].Annals of the Rheumatic Disease,1980,39:135- 137.
  • 3[3]HUSKISSON EC,JONE J,SCOTT PJ.Application of visual analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity[J].Rheumatology and Rehabilitation,1976,15:185- 187.
  • 4[4]DOWNIE WW,LEATHAM PA,RHIND VM.Studies with pain rating scales[J].Annals of the Rheumatics Diseases,1978, 37: 378- 381.
  • 5[5]WILKIE D,LOVEJOY N,DODD M,et al.Cancer pain intensity measurement:concurrent validity of three tools- finger dynameter,pain intensity number scale, visual analogue scale[J].Hospice Journal,1990, 6:1- 13.
  • 6[6]MARCHAND S,BUSHNELL MC,DUNCAN GH.Modulation of heat pa- in perception by high frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)[J].Clinical Journal of Pain,1991,1: 122- 129.
  • 7[7]PRICE DD,BUSH FM,LONG S,et al.A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scale[J].Pain,1994, 56: 217- 226.
  • 8[8]JESEN MP,MCFARLAND CA.Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients[J].Pain,1993,55:195- 203.
  • 9[9]RANSFORD AO, CAIRNS D,MOONEY V.The Pain drawing as an aid to the psychological evaluation of patients with low- back pain[J].Spine,1976,1(2):127- 134.
  • 10[10]MARGOLIS RB,CHIBNALL JT,TAIT RC.Test- retest reliability of the pain draw instrument[J].Pain,1988,33:49- 51.

共引文献479

同被引文献4

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部