期刊文献+

基于有效性及伦理学原则探讨新药Ⅱ、Ⅲ期临床试验的设计思路与方法 被引量:2

Design idea and methodology for the Ⅱ and Ⅲ clinical trial of the new drugs in view of effectiveness and ethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于新药临床研究中选择阳性药物为对照存在可能无法真实评价新药疗效的可能性,以及新药临床试验本身存在的广义伦理学问题,提出新药临床研究过程中,至少应在Ⅱ期选择安慰剂作为对照组,视研究目标疾病情况可以选择病情较轻的受试者参加试验,在首先验证新药的绝对有效性的基础上安排Ⅱ期二阶段和Ⅲ期临床试验:Ⅱ期二阶段可以采用add-on研究模式,适当扩大适应征;Ⅲ期临床试验可以选择安慰剂,也可以选择合适的阳性药物作为对照组,从而既保证了新药的绝对有效性,又使新药临床试验更加符合伦理学原则。 For clinical trials,efficacy evaluation of new drugs might not be reliable if it is based on positive drugs for comparison.Furthermore,the clinical trial itself might encounter general ethical problems.When proposing clinical trials for new drugs,placebo drugs should be chosen for comparison during Phase II.In view of research objective and disease situation,patients with mild conditions should be chosen for clinical trials.On the basis of effectiveness of the new drugs,second stage of Phase II and Phase III can be arranged.Add-on research methodology can be adopted in the second stage of Phase II to adequately extend indication.Phase III clinical trials can choose placebo or suitable positive drugs for comparison.This will ensure the effectiveness of the new drugs as well as meet the ethical requirements.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 CAS CSCD 2011年第5期586-589,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
基金 国家科技重大专项课题(2009ZX10005-017) 中国人民解放军第三O二医院院内课题(YNKT2010012)
关键词 疗效 伦理学 临床试验 设计 Therapeutic effect Ethics Clinical trials Design
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献37

  • 1于莉莉,夏结来,蒋红卫.几种简单设计的等效性检验的样本量与检验效能[J].第四军医大学学报,2004,25(11):1045-1049. 被引量:9
  • 2卞兆祥,David MOHER,Simon DAGENAIS,李幼平,刘良,吴泰相,缪江霞.提高中草药随机对照试验的质量Ⅱ:对照组设计(英文)[J].中西医结合学报,2006,4(2):130-136. 被引量:24
  • 3CPMP: Points to consider on biostatistical/methodological issues arising from recent CPMP discussions on licensing applications: choice of delta, Concept Paper on the development of a Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products ( CPMP), 1999.
  • 4ICH. Guideline E9 : statistical issues in clinical trials. International Con- ference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use ( ICH), 1998.
  • 5CPMP: Guideline on the Choice of Non-inferiority Margin, Concept Paper on the development of a Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) ,2005.
  • 6ICH. Guideline E10 : Choice of control group and related issues in clinical trials. International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), 2000.
  • 7Hung HMJ, Wang S J, O' Neill R. A regulatory perspective on choice of margin and statistical inference issue in non-inferiority trials. Biometrical Journal ,2005,47:28-36.
  • 8Pigeot I, Schafer J, Rohrnel J, et al. Assessing non-inferiority of a new treatment in a three-arm clinical trial including a placebo. Statistics in Medicine, 2003,22 : 883 -899.
  • 9Koch GG, Tangen CM. Nonparametric analysis of covariance and its role in noninferiofity clinical trials. Drug Information Journal, 1999,33 : 1145 - 1159.
  • 10Berger RL, Hsu JC. Bioequivalence trials,intersection-union tests and equivalence confidence sets. Statistical Science, 1996,11:283-319.

共引文献146

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部