期刊文献+

双重否定标记性的双向优选论分析 被引量:1

The Markedness of Double Negation:a Bi-directional OT Account
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言的成功交际包含说话人对语言的产出和听话人对语言的理解。传统语言学家霍恩和格莱斯虽已提出了"语用分工"理论,但是他们都孤立地仅从说话人或者听话人的角度去分析语言的产出或理解,而语言的产出和理解其实是相互影响、相互制约的。双向优选理论正好将语言形式和意义有机地结合起来,很好地解释了在英语或汉语交际过程中说话人对肯定句或双重否定句的句式选择,以及听话人对句子意义的理解。 The successful language communication includes language production and interpretation.The"Division of Pragmatic Labor" proposed by Horn and Grice studies language form or meaning one at a time,but form and meaning are reciprocally dependent.Bidirectional Optimality Theory,which incorporates both syntactic and semantic factors into its framework,well explains speaker's choice of syntactic form and hearer's semantic interpretation of affirmation and double negation and sentences.
作者 陈乾峰
出处 《韶关学院学报》 2011年第5期94-97,共4页 Journal of Shaoguan University
关键词 双向优选论 语用分工 排序 标记性 Bidirectional OT Division of Pragmatic Labor ranking markedness
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1GRIMSHAW J.Projection,Heads,and Optimality[J].Linguistic Inquiry,1997 (28):373-422.
  • 2HENDRIKS P,de HOOP H.Optimality Theoretic Semantics[J].Linguistics and Philosophy,2001 (24):1-32.
  • 3BLUTNER R.Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation[J].Journal of Semanfies,2000 (17):189-216.
  • 4何兆熊.新编语用学概要[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2002..
  • 5BOUMA G,HENDRIKS P,de HOOP H,et al.Conflicts in Interpretation.In Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation.Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences,2007:56.
  • 6BEAVER D,LEE H.Form-Meaning Asymmetries and Bidirectional Optimization.In J.Spenader,A.Eriksson and Osten Dabl (eds.),Variation within Optimality Theory[C].University of Stockholm,2003:138-148.
  • 7ZWARTS J.Paths Round a Prototype.In Patrick Saint-Dizier (ed.),ACL-SIGSEM workshop:The Linguistic Dimensions of Prepositions and their Use in Computational Formalisns and Applications[C].Toulouse:IRIT,2003:228-238.
  • 8PRINCE A,SMOLENSKY P.Optimality Theory:.Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar[R].Report No.RuCCS-TR-2.New Brunswick,NJ:Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science,1993.

共引文献58

同被引文献18

  • 1王嘉龄.优选论[J].当代语言学,1995(1):1-4. 被引量:43
  • 2许菊.母语迁移的认知理据[J].中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,25(1):159-162. 被引量:19
  • 3杨丁秀.从连通主义看二语色彩词习得中的母语迁移[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2007,8(5):96-98. 被引量:1
  • 4闫小斌.双向优选论评介[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2007,29(10):7-10. 被引量:3
  • 5Bache C. Constraining Conceptual Integration Theory:Level of Blending and Disintegration[J].Journal of Pragmties,2005,(37):1615-1635.
  • 6Benz,A. Towards a Framework for Bidirectional Optimality Theory in Danymic Contexts[M].Humboldt Universit(a)t Berlin,2001.1-22.
  • 7Blutner R. Some Aspects of Optimality in Natural Language Interpretation[J].Journal of Semantics,2000,(17):189-216.
  • 8Fauconnier G.Mappings in Thought and Language[M]北京京:世界图书出版公司北京分司,2010.
  • 9Hour,A,Harrigan,K. Asymmetries in the Acquisition of Definite and Indefinite NPs[J].Lingua,2010,(120):1973-1990.
  • 10Lakoff,G,Johnson,M. Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:the University of Chicago Press,2003.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部