期刊文献+

“双规”期间自首的认定——自首从宽的立法本质探究 被引量:1

On the Standards of Surrendering during the Cognizance of the BNRS from the Legislation Essence of being Lenient with Confessing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 犯罪人主动将自己交付国家追诉,从而使犯罪得以及时侦破和审判,达到节约司法资源的效果是自首从宽的本质。对于在纪检监察部门"双规"期间如实供述罪行的能否认定为自首的问题,既不能一律都视为自首,也不能一律否定为自首,应当从自首从宽的立法本质出发,结合我国宽严相济的刑事政策,全面、合理地理解、适用,真正实现自首制度设立的价值和意义。 Offenders actively delivery himself to the prosecution of the institutions in the country,thus making the criminal prosecution may be timely detected and judged,achieving the goals that save judicial resources effect.It is the essence of confessing one's crimes and being lenient.Whether the disciplinary inspection and supervision department "NRS" during truthfully statement of crimes can be identified as surrender problem are deemed neither surrenders nor negative surrenders.We should completely and rationally understand and apply,even really realize surrendering systems establishment significance and meaning from the legislation essence of the surrendering and being lenient,combining with the criminal policy of tempering justice with mercy.
作者 李书芳
出处 《韶关学院学报》 2011年第5期107-110,共4页 Journal of Shaoguan University
关键词 自首从宽 立法本质 双规 认定 be lenient with confessing legislation essence under investigation at appointed duration and place cognizance
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1周振想.刑罚适应论[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.297-298.
  • 2张明楷.刑法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2007:860.
  • 3大谷实 黎宏译.刑法总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2003..
  • 4高铭喧.刑法专论[M]3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2002.569.
  • 5杜强.试论“盘问下的自动投案”[J].法学杂志,2003,24(3):54-55. 被引量:5
  • 6最高人民法院..最高人民检察院有关负责人就《关于办理职务犯罪案件认定自首、立功等量刑情节若干问题的意见》答记者问[EB/OL]..http://fanfu.people.com.cn/GB/64379/8999130.html,,(2009-03-20)[2011-02-23]..

二级参考文献1

  • 1《刑事法律问题汇编》(续第四辑),台湾法务通讯杂志社,1982年7月印行,第57页.

共引文献404

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部