朝鲜李仁老《青鹤洞记》与陶渊明《桃花源记》之比较

A Comparison of "Travels of Qinghe Cave" by Korean Li Renlao and "Travels of the Land of Peach Blossom" by Tao Yuanming

朝鲜李仁老《青鹤洞记》与陶渊明《桃花源记》有诸多相似之处,即都以抒发自己的意愿及理想为主要内容;二文虽造语平淡,但所用意象鲜明,寓意深远。因构建各自理想的基础的不同,导致二文的思想旨归各异:《青鹤洞记》充满对归隐的渴望和无法实现的惆怅,《桃花源记》体现的归隐意识则是对自身理想的坚守。两篇文章行文脉络各具特点:李仁老按事件发展顺序平淡叙述,陶渊明则层层设疑,引人入胜。

Compared ＂Travels of Qinghe Cave＂by Korean Li Renlao with ＂Travels of the Land of Peach Blossom＂Tao Yuanming, they have many similarities, namely to express their wishes and ideals as the main content; and language used in both of them is plain, but it creates a distinctive imagery and significance. However, their different ideal constructions lead to different ideological purports. The former is full of desire for seclusion and melancholy for being unable to achieve, while the latter refleets his sticking to his own ideal of consolidation. In writing styles, they also have different characteristics. Li Renlao narrated the events plainly according to their development sequences, while Tao Yuanming deserihed the events by introducing various doubts, whieh made the article fascinating.