期刊文献+

基于证据理论和云理论的C^4ISR系统效能评估 被引量:4

Effectiveness evaluation for C^4ISR system based on evidence theory and cloud theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解决C4ISR系统效能的定性评估问题,提出了一种基于证据理论和云理论的评估方法。首先,构建效能信度模型,通过评估专家对效能信度的赋值反映出定性评估过程中的不确定性,然后采用折扣融合证据规则对评估值进行融合,克服了专家经验知识不同所带来的证据高冲突性,最后使用云重心评判法得到系统效能的定性评估结果。仿真结果表明:该评估方法简单有效,并且适用于和C4ISR系统类似的复杂系统效能定性评估。 To solve the problem of qualitative evaluation for C4ISR system effectiveness,a method was proposed based on evidence theory and cloud theory.Effectiveness reliability model was constructed at first,so the uncertainty in the course of qualitative evaluation can be reflected by effectiveness reliability set by evaluation experts.Then the discounting evidence combination rule was used to fuse the results in order to get the reasonable evaluation ones,which overcomes the highly conflict generated by the knowledge difference among evaluation experts.Finally,the qualitative result of effectiveness evaluation was generated by using the method of membership cloud gravity center(MCGC).Simulation results show that this method is simple and effective and can be applicable to qualitative evaluation for other similar complicated systems.
出处 《海军工程大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2011年第3期10-15,共6页 Journal of Naval University of Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(60634030) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60702066) 航空科学基金资助项目(2006ZC53037)
关键词 C4ISR系统 定性效能评估 效能信度模型 证据理论 云理论 C4ISR system qualitative effectiveness evaluation effectiveness reliability model evidence theory cloud theory
分类号 E917 [军事]
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1PORCHE I RIII, WILSON B. The Impact of Network Performance on Warfighter Effectiveness [R/OL]. http:// wwwcgi, rand. org/pubs/technical_reports/TR329,2009-11-12/2010-12-30.
  • 2SHAFER G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence [M]. Princeton: Princeton U. P. , 1976.
  • 3SMARANDACHE F, DEZERT J. Proportional conflict redistribution rules for information fusion [J]. Applications and Advances of DSmT for Information Fusion, 2006,2 : 3-- 68.
  • 4JOUSSELME A L, GRENIER D, BOSSE E. A new distance between two bodies of evidence[J].Information Fusion, 2001,2:91--101.
  • 5刘准钆,程咏梅,潘泉,苗壮.多传感器冲突信息的加权融合算法[J].传感技术学报,2009,22(3):366-370. 被引量:29
  • 6李德毅,刘常昱,杜鹢,韩旭.不确定性人工智能[J].软件学报,2004,15(11):1583-1594. 被引量:394
  • 7焦跃,李德毅,杨朝晖.一种评价C^3I系统效能的新方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1998,18(12):68-73. 被引量:36

二级参考文献18

  • 1李德毅,刘常昱.论正态云模型的普适性[J].中国工程科学,2004,6(8):28-34. 被引量:880
  • 2王梓坤.论混沌与随机[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),1994,30(2):199-202. 被引量:16
  • 3李德毅.发现状态空间理论[J].小型微型计算机系统,1994,15(11):1-6. 被引量:25
  • 4李德毅,孟海军,史雪梅.隶属云和隶属云发生器[J].计算机研究与发展,1995,32(6):15-20. 被引量:1212
  • 5叶清,吴晓平,宋业新.基于权重系数与冲突概率重新分配的证据合成方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2006,28(7):1014-1016. 被引量:32
  • 6Jousselme A I., Grenier D, Bosse E. A New Distance Between Two Bodies of Evidence[J]. Information Fusion, 2001(2) :91- 101.
  • 7Sharer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence[M]. Princeton U. P. : Princeton, N.J. ,1976.
  • 8Yager R R. On the Dempster Sharer Framework and New Combination Rules[J]. Information System, 1989, 41 (2) : 93-137.
  • 9Smarandache F,Dezert J. Proportional Conflict Redistribution Rules for Information Fusion[M]. In F. Smarandache and J. Dezert, Editors, Applications and Advances of {DSmT for Information Fusion} .2006 , Volume 2, Chapter 1 : 3 -68. American Research Press Rehoboth.
  • 10Murphy C K. Combining Belief Functions When Evidence Conflicts[J].Decision Support Systems, 2000(29) : 1-9.

共引文献454

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部