摘要
毋庸讳言,滥觞于最小犯罪常数之争的二元论与结果无价值是违法性论域的两种截然对立的刑法观,其争锋已衍生至林林总总的意域而彰显深远意蕴。通过历史论、本体论及语境论这三面向度的理论蓄势来勘破这一决定刑法基本立场的元命题:结果无价值具有优选性,其应顶替社会危害性理论而作为实质违法性甄别的根基。二元论徒具修辞意义。
Needless to say, Dual Handlungsunwert and Erfolgsunwert, which is originated from the debate of which is the smallest constant, are two diametrically opposed views of criminal law, which has led to a wide range of fields and highlighted far-reaching implications. This article is based on history, ontology and context to look into the original kernel of two theories, then illustrate that Erfolgsunwert is the better choice , so we should let it become an important weapon so as to replace the position of "harmful to society" and judge the real illegality. Dual Handlungsunwert is only a rhetorical technique.
出处
《福建警察学院学报》
2011年第2期79-82,89,共5页
Journal of Fujian Police College
关键词
结果无价值
二元论
实质违法性
"Erfolgsunwert"
dual "Handlungsunwert"
substantice law violation