期刊文献+

题型训练中多选题与简答题对提高学生听力成绩的对比研究

A Comparative Study on Test-based Teaching of MCQ and OEQ in the Improvement of Students' Listening Achievement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究旨在讨论哪种题型的针对性训练更能提高学生的听力成绩。在这个研究中,华南农业大学珠江学院的两个班学生分别参加了为期一个月的题型的针对性训练教学实验。在实验的前后分别在两个班做了前测和后测,并使用了SPSS统计软件对收集到的数据进行统计分析。研究的结论证实了简答题题型针对性训练比多项选择题针对性训练更能提高学生的听力成绩。这对教师如何设计有效的听力课堂活动及学生如何复习听力考试提供了一定的借鉴意义。 This study aims to examine the different effects of the two response types on improving students' listening achievement.In the empirical study,72 students in Zhujiang College of South China Agricultural University participated in the one-month test-based teaching experiment.A pretest and a posttest were administrated before and after the experiment.The test scores were processed with SPSS16 and Paired Samples T test and Independent Samples T test were carried out.The results show that compared with the MCQ,OEQ can better improve the students' listening performance.The findings will provide some suggestions for the teachers in designing the activities for the listening class and test review.
作者 纪迎春
出处 《湖南工业职业技术学院学报》 2011年第3期123-124,131,共3页 Journal of Hunan Industry Polytechnic
关键词 多项选择题 简答题 题型针对性训练 样本t检验 multiple-choice questions open-ended questions test-based teaching criterion-related validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Bachman Lyle F. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press,1990,81-159.
  • 2Buck, G. 1991. The testing of listening comprehension: an introspective study,Language Testing, 8 (1), 67-91.
  • 3Samson D M.Rasch and Reading[J]. ERIC: ED282418, 1983.
  • 4Schohamy, E. 1984. 'Does the test method make a difference? The case of reading comprdaensin'. Language Testing. 1(2): 147-70.
  • 5Wu Shiyu, Zhu Fangyan. A Contrastive Analysis of MCQ & SAQ in Assessing Reading [J]. CELEA Journal (Bimonthly), Dec 2006, 29(6): 56-61.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部