文史本根生 相生何太急——浅谈文学与史学出现早晚问题

Grown from the Same Tree,Why Haggling over the Former or Later of Literature and History:Literature and History of the Existing Problem Sooner or Later

文学和史学的起源关系是一个古老的问题。文史不分家是我国古代治史的传统。随着学术的日益发展则分科愈精密,此前本是一家之体,而今蔚然成一独立学科者,比比皆是。就史学和文学这两大知识门类来看,无论是在中国的学术传统中,还是在西方的学术背景下,两者间的关系既呈现出划然可分的边界,又往往互相含摄、彼此纠缠。自从历史学被划入科学的范畴后,史学和文学之间的问题就尖锐起来。本来是孪生兄弟的史学和文学,如今却在争论何者更早出现,这个现象值得引起我们的注意。在这里,我主要以中国的史学与文学为探讨对象进行探讨。

Relationship between literature and history of the origin,is an old problem.History in ancient China,regardless of family history of tradition.With the increasing development of the division of academic more precise,this is one of the body previously,but now ran into an independent subject who,everywhere.History and literature on the knowledge of these two categories,both the academic tradition in China,or in the western academic context,the relationship between plan showing both the natural boundary of separable,often with each photo,entanglement.Since history is included in the scope of science,the history and literature on the acute problems between them.