摘要
"后ECFA时代"为两岸经贸关系掀开了新的历史篇章。投资者的趋之若鹜加剧了两岸的区际法律冲突,而触摸《海峡两岸共同打击犯罪及司法互助协议》的脉动,距离实现互利互惠的司法协助目标尚需艰难曲折的演进过程。投资争端的特有属性致使大陆地区沿袭单边冲突及专属管辖的民事诉讼规则,为平行诉讼和判决的不予执行埋下了祸根,其弊端可见一斑。为了保护两岸投资者的合法利益,采用更多连结点,设计双边或多边冲突规范及摒弃专属管辖实为明智之举。
The coming of post-ECFA era will surely become a landmark in the evolution of cross-strait economic relations.Consequently the investors scram-ble for the markets and it increases the probability of interregional laws conflict.In fact,through slightly feel the pulse of "Cross-strait Joint Fight against Crime and Mutual Legal Assistance",it has a long way to go toward the goal of re-ciprocal and mutual-beneficial judicial assistance,and it is with difficulties and set-backs.Attributing to the particular settlement of investment,the mainland is used to abiding by the unilateral conflict rule and exclusive jurisdiction in civil procedural law,which fills the bane and leads to parallel proceedings and with-out recognition or enforcement of the judgment.In short it would be wise that we could design more bilateral or multilateral conflict rules instead of the unilat-eral ones in view of the critical issue.
出处
《国际贸易问题》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第7期161-168,共8页
Journal of International Trade
关键词
后ECFA时代
投资争端
司法协助
Post-ECFA era
Investment conflicts
Judicial assistance