期刊文献+

3种硬组织替代材料骨细胞相容性研究 被引量:2

Cytocompatibility of Three Substituted Materials of Human Beings' Hard Tissue
全文增补中
导出
摘要 目的 :研究羟基磷灰石 (HA)、生物玻璃陶瓷 (BGC)和钛合金 (Ti- 6Al- 4 V) 3种骨替代材料的细胞相容性 ,探讨体外评价骨替代材料细胞相容性的简捷快速的实验方法。方法 :选用 SD乳鼠颅顶骨成骨细胞 ,采用体外细胞培养方法 ,将细胞接种于 HA、BGC和 Ti- 6Al- 4 V 3种材料表面后 ,分别观察 1、3、5、7d时细胞形态及生长增殖率 ,评价 3种材料的骨细胞相容性。结果 :在 3种材料的表面 ,成骨细胞以锚状结构牢固地粘附 ,并具有良好的细胞形态和增殖率。其中以 HA和 BGC的骨细胞相容性较好 ,Ti- 6Al- 4 V相对较差。结论 :体外成骨细胞培养法从细胞形态及生长增殖率方面能客观反映 3种硬组织替代材料和细胞之间的相互作用 ,可作为体外研究骨替代材料细胞相容性的简捷快速的实验方法。 Objective: To evaluate the osteocompatibility of three substituted materials of human beings' hard tissue (hydroxyapatite, bioglass ceramic and Ti 6Al 4V) and a new experimental method for evaluating the osteocompatibility of replaced materials of hard tissues in vitro. Methods: The isolated osteoblasts from parietal and frontal bones of Sparague Dawley rats from 1 day to 3 days were used to estimate osteocompatibility of three substituted materials in vitro. The cells were inoculated onto specimens of HA, BGC and Ti 6Al 4V for 1 day, 3, 5 and 7 days, then the morphology and proliferating rates of cells on different materials were tested. Results: Rat osteoblasts could attach, spread and proliferate on three materials as normal cells, and proliferating rates of cells on HA and BGC surface were as the same as normal, but that on Ti 6Al 4V was lower than the normal cells. Conclusion: The osteocompatibility of HA and BGC are better than that of Ti 6Al 4V and rat osteoblast culture system can be used to evaluate the osteocompatibility of substituted materials in vitro.
作者 唐昭 陈治清
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1999年第3期199-201,I009,共4页 West China Journal of Stomatology
关键词 硬组织替代材料 成骨细胞 生物相容性 biomaterial osteoblast biocompatibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献2

  • 1杨小东,博士学位论文,1989年
  • 2徐荣辉,解剖学报,1988年,19卷,13期,53页

共引文献14

同被引文献14

  • 1Birkenhayer-frenkel DH.Bone appositional rate and percertage of doubly and singly labelled surface:comparision of from 5 and 20μm sections.Bone,1987,8∶7
  • 2Jiwsey J.The bone biopsy. New York and London:Plaum medical Book, 1997∶32-34
  • 3Ozaw S, Kasugai S. Evaluation of implant materials (hydroxyapatite, glass ceramics, titanium) in rat bone marrow stromal cell culture. Biomaterials, 1996;17(1):23.
  • 4Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, et al. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involvevitronectin. Tissue Eng, 2001;7(3): 291.
  • 5Jarcho M, Kay JF, Gumaer KI, et al. Tissue, cellular and subcellular events at a bone-ceramic hydroxylapatite interface.J Bioeng,1997;2 : 79.
  • 6Puleo DA, Holleran LA, Doremus RH, et al. Osteoblast responses to orthopaedic implant materials in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res,1991;25: 711-723.
  • 7Nanotechnology. The next small thing. The Economist, July 7th 2001.
  • 8孙皓.羟基磷灰石修复颌骨囊肿术后骨腔及牙周骨缺损[J].口腔医学纵横,1999,15(2):123-123.
  • 9邱明才,杨宝恩.正常国人髂骨形态计量参数的研究[J].中华医学杂志,1990,70(12):685-690. 被引量:9
  • 10黄永光,陈治清,李芃.硬组织替代材料对成骨细胞骨钙蛋白、碱性磷酸酶水平的影响[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2000,18(3):192-194. 被引量:6

引证文献2

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部