期刊文献+

Comment on “Constraining the smoothness parameter and dark energy using observational H(z) data”

Comment on "Constraining the smoothness parameter and dark energy using observational H(z) data"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 We discuss a recent analysis by Yu et al.[RAA 11,125(2011)] about constraints on the smoothness parameter α and dark energy models using observational H(z) data.It is argued here that their procedure is conceptually inconsistent with the basic assumptions underlying the adopted Dyer-Roeder approach.In order to properly quantify the influence of the H(z) data on the smoothness parameter α,a χ2-test involving a sample of type Ia supernovae and H(z) data in the context of a flat ΛCDM model is reanalyzed.This result is confronted with an earlier approach discussed by Santos et al.(2008) without H(z) data.In the(Ωm,α) plane,it is found that such parameters are now restricted to be in the intervals 0.66 ≤ α ≤ 1.0 and 0.27 ≤ Ωm ≤ 0.37 within the 95.4 confidence level(2σ),and,therefore,are fully compatible with the homogeneous case.The basic conclusion is that a joint analysis involving H(z) data can indirectly improve our knowledge about the influence of the inhomogeneities.However,this happens only because the H(z) data provide tighter constraints on the matter density parameter Ωm. We discuss a recent analysis by Yu et al.[RAA 11,125(2011)] about constraints on the smoothness parameter α and dark energy models using observational H(z) data.It is argued here that their procedure is conceptually inconsistent with the basic assumptions underlying the adopted Dyer-Roeder approach.In order to properly quantify the influence of the H(z) data on the smoothness parameter α,a χ2-test involving a sample of type Ia supernovae and H(z) data in the context of a flat ΛCDM model is reanalyzed.This result is confronted with an earlier approach discussed by Santos et al.(2008) without H(z) data.In the(Ωm,α) plane,it is found that such parameters are now restricted to be in the intervals 0.66 ≤ α ≤ 1.0 and 0.27 ≤ Ωm ≤ 0.37 within the 95.4 confidence level(2σ),and,therefore,are fully compatible with the homogeneous case.The basic conclusion is that a joint analysis involving H(z) data can indirectly improve our knowledge about the influence of the inhomogeneities.However,this happens only because the H(z) data provide tighter constraints on the matter density parameter Ωm.
出处 《Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第6期637-640,共4页 天文和天体物理学研究(英文版)
基金 VCB is supported by CNPq(Brazilian Research Agency)
关键词 cosmology dark energy cosmological parameters cosmology — dark energy — cosmological parameters
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Alcaniz, J. S., Lima, J. A. S., & Silva, R. 2004, International Journal of Modem Physics D, 13, 1309.
  • 2Bildhauer, S., & Futamase, T. 1991, MNRAS, 249, 126.
  • 3Buchert, T., & Ehlers, J. 1997, A&A, 320, 1.
  • 4Daly, R. A., Diorgovski, S. G., Freeman, K. A., et al. 2008, ApJ, 677, 1.
  • 5Dyer, C. C., & Roeder, R. C. 1972, ApJ, 174, Ll15.
  • 6Dyer, C. C., & Roeder, R. C. 1973, ApJ, 180, L31.
  • 7Gurvits, L. I., Kellermann, K. I., & Frey, S. 1999, A&A, 342, 378.
  • 8Kantowski, R. 1969, ApJ, 155, 89.
  • 9Lima, J. A. S., & Alcaniz, J. S. 2000, A&A, 357, 393.
  • 10Lima, J. A. S., & Alcaniz, J. S. 2002, ApJ, 566, 15.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部