期刊文献+

^125粒子食管支架在晚期食管癌治疗中的价值研究 被引量:4

Esophageal intraluminal stents with ^125I seeds for advanced esophageal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过观察^125I粒子食管支架对晚期食管癌患者的生存期及生活质量的影响从而评价其疗效。方法采取前瞻性研究方法,对37例接受^125I粒子食管支架治疗的晚期食管癌患者进行随访研究,详细记录患者的生存期,并使用癌症患者生活质量核心量表标准问卷(QLQ-C30)和食管癌专用量表(QLQ-OES18)评价食管支架植入前、植人后1周、植入后3个月时患者的生活质量,并对所得结果进行统计学分析,比较各观察时点间的差异。结果37例患者的3个月生存率为94.6%(35/37),半年生存率为51.4%(19/37)。食管支架植入后1周较支架植入前,QLQ-C30量表中情绪功能、认知功能、总体健康状况、疲倦、疼痛、经济困难得分及QLQ-OES18量表中疼痛得分明显升高(P〈0.05),QLQ-C30量表中恶心呕吐得分及QLQ-OES18量表中吞咽功能、进食不适、咽口水困难、吞咽梗阻得分明显降低(P〈0.05),两量表中其他各项差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。食管支架植入后3个月较支架植入前,QLQ-C30量表中经济困难得分仍明显升高(P〈o.05),QLQ-c30量表中恶心呕吐得分及QLQ-OES18量表中吞咽功能、进食不适、咽口水困难、吞咽梗阻得分仍明显降低(P〈0.05),两量表中其他各项差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);较支架植入后1周,QLQ-C30量表中经济困难得分及QLQ.OES18量表中吞咽功能、吞咽梗阻得分升高(P〈0.05),QLQ-C30量表中角色功能、情绪功能、认知功能、疲倦得分及QLQ-OES18量表中疼痛得分明显降低(P〈0.05),两量表中其他各项差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论^125I粒子结合食管支架能够有效延长食管癌晚期患者的生存期,可改善患者的生活质量。 Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of esophageal intraluminal stents with ^125I seeds based on survival time and quality of life (QOL) of patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Methods A total of 37 patients with advanced esophageal cancer who underwent placement of esophageal ^125I irradiation stent were followed up. The QOL was evaluated by QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 questionnaires before the procedure, and I week and 3 months after. Results The mean survival time of 37 patients was 28 weeks, with 3-month and 6-month survival rates at 94. 6% (35/37) and 51.4% (19/37), respectively. Compared with the baseline, the scores of emotional functioning (EF) , cognitive functioning (CF) , global quality of life(QL), fatigue( FA), pain( PA), financial difficulties(FI) and pain of QLQ-OES18 (OESPA) assessed 1 week after stent placement increased ( P 〈 0. 05 ) significantly and dysphapia of QLQ-OES18 ( OESDYS), eating of QLQ-OES18 ( OESEAT), trouble swallowing saliva of QLQ-OES18 ( OESSV ) and choked when swallowing of QLQ-OES18 (OESCH) decreased significantly ( P 〈 0. 05 ). At 3 months after stent placement, the scores of FI increased significantly ( P 〈 0. 05 ) , and those of nausea or vomiting (NV) , OESDYS, OESEAT, OESSV and OESCH decreased significantly ( P 〈 0.05 ). The scores of FI,OESDYS, OESCH, role functioning(RF), EF, CF, FA and OESPA at 3 months were significantly different from those at 1 week after the procedure (P 〈 0. 05 ). Other variables at 1 week and 3 months after the pro- cedure were not different from those before (P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion Implantation of ^125I seeds combined with esophageal intraluminal stents may prolong survival time and improve QOL of patients with advanced esophageal cancer.
出处 《中华消化内镜杂志》 北大核心 2011年第6期301-304,共4页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy
关键词 生活质量 晚期食管癌 食管支架 腔内放疗 Quality of life Advanced esophageal cancer Esophageal stent Intraluminal irradiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Crooks V,Waller S,Smith T,et al.The use of the Karnofsky Performance Scale in determining outcomes and risk in geriatric outpatients.J Gerontol,1991,46:M139-M144.
  • 2Louis C,Dewas S,Mirabel X,et al.Stereotactic radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma:preliminary results.Technol Cancer Res Treat,2010,9:479-487.
  • 3Blazeby JM,Alderson D,Winstone K,et al.Development of an EORTC questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessment for patients with oesophageal cancer.The EORTC Quality of Life Study Group.Eur J Cancer,1996,32:A1912-1917.
  • 4Blazeby JM,Conroy T,Hammerlid E,et al.Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module,the EORTC QLQ-OES18,to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer.Eur J Cancer,2003,39:1384-1394.
  • 5万崇华,陈明清,张灿珍,汤学良,孟琼,张晓磬.癌症患者生命质量测定量表EORTC QLQ-C30中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2005,20(4):353-355. 被引量:1265
  • 6徐皖湘,钱勇,陈振东.食管癌化疗患者生存质量测定量表中文版的研制与考评[J].现代肿瘤医学,2007,15(12):1792-1794. 被引量:15
  • 7钱勇,张从军,陈振东.食管癌化疗患者生活质量评价133例[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(18):1819-1823. 被引量:8

二级参考文献26

  • 1祝淑钗,李任,李娟,邱嵘,韩春,万钧.非手术治疗胸段食管癌临床分期与预后关系的初步探讨[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2004,13(3):189-192. 被引量:70
  • 2全国肿瘤防治研究办公室 卫生部卫生统计信息中心.中国恶性肿瘤危险因素研究[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2003..
  • 3Blazeby JM,Conroy T,Hammerlid E,Fayers P,Sezer O,Koller M,Arraras J,Bottomley A,Vickery CW,Etienne PL,Alderson D.Clinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module,the EORTC QLQ-OES18,to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer.Eur J Cancer 2003, 39:1384-1394
  • 4Fayers PM,Asronson NK,Bjordal K.On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group.The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual.3rd ed.Brussels:EORTC,2001:6-7
  • 5Ross P,Nicolson M,Cunningham D,Valle J,Seymour M,Harper P,Price T,Anderson H,Iveson T,Hickish T,Lofts F,Norman A.Prospective randomized trial comparing mitomycin,cisplatin,and protracted venous-infusion fluorouracil (PVI5-FU) With epirubicin,cisplatin,and PVI 5-FU in advanced esophagogastric cancer.J Clin Oncol 2002, 20:1996-2004
  • 6Stoller JL,Samer KJ,Toppin DI,Flores AD.Carcinoma of the esophagus:a new proposal for the evaluation of treatment.Can J Surg 1977, 20:454-459
  • 7Michelson H,Bolund C,Nilsson B,Brandberg Y.Health-related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30-reference values from a large sample of Swedish population.Acta Oncol 2000, 39:477-484
  • 8Blazeby JM,Brookes ST,Alderson D.Prognostic value of quality of life scores in patients with oesophageal cancer.Br J Surg 2000, 87:362-373
  • 9Hjermstad MJ,Fayers PM,Bjordal K,Kaasa S.Health-related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire:the QLQ=C30(+ 3).J Clin Oncol1998, 16:1188-1196
  • 10MRC Oesophageal Cancer Working Party.Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer a randomized controlled trail.Lancet 2002, 359:1727-1733

共引文献1282

同被引文献15

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部