期刊文献+

反强制性外交机理浅探

Shallow Exploration of Anti-coercive Diplomacy Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 反强制性外交是因应强制性外交而产生的一种方略,其目的是通过采取各种措施,阻止、转移或消除强制性外交带来的风险。研究反强制性外交的基本内涵、形成原因、主要策略和实施功效,不仅可以纠正这一领域过度分析强制国的偏差,而且还可以更清晰地展示受制国的主体性和能动性,全面认识这种动态关系的特征。 Anti-coercive diplomacy is generated in response to coercive diplomacy,the purpose of which is to take various meas-ures to prevent,transfer or eliminate risks resulting from coercive diplomacy.The author believes that,studying basic connotations,evolving causes,main policies and implementing effects of anti-coercive diplomacy,can not only correct the deviation of over-emphasis on the coercive country of the field,but also much more clearly demonstrate the subjec-tivity and initiative of the coerced country and comprehensively understand the characteristics of this dynamic relation-ship.
作者 魏光启
出处 《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第4期5-9,共5页 Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
基金 阜阳师范学院2010年人文社科项目"强制性外交研究"(2010FSSK12)阶段性成果
关键词 强制性外交 反强制性外交 强制国 受制国 coercive diplomacy anti-coercive diplomacy the coercive country the coerced country
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Alexander L. George, David K. Hall and William E. Si - mons. The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy [ M ]. Bouhher, Colo : Westview Press, 1994.
  • 2Peter V. Jakobsen, Nigel Clive. Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy "after the Cold War: A Challenge for Theory and Practice[M]. New York : St. Martins Press, 1998.
  • 3Robert J. Art, Patrick M. Cronin. The United States and Coercive Diplomacy[ M]. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2003.
  • 4钱春泰.美国与强制外交理论[J].美国研究,2006,20(3):49-64. 被引量:13
  • 5[美]罗伯特·阿特,等.国际政治--常在概念和当代问题[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.

二级参考文献36

  • 1[美]詹姆斯·多尔蒂 小罗伯特·普法尔茨格拉夫著 阎学通 陈寒溪.《争论中的国际关系理论》[M].北京:世界知识出版社,2003年版.第631页.
  • 2Alexander L. George and William E. Simons,eds. , The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy 2nd edn. (Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1994),pp. 7-10.pp.8-9.p.54.pp.270-290.p.16.p.281.p.288.
  • 3Alexander L. George, ed. , Avoiding War: Problems of Crisis Management (Boulder, Colo:Westview Press, 1991), p. 380.
  • 4Gary Schaub, "Compellence: Resuscitating the Concept," Strategic Coercion: Concepts and Cases, ed. Lawrence Freedman (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 38.p.329.pp.58-59.
  • 5Robert S. Ross, "The 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait Confrontation: Coercion, Credibility, and the Use of Force," International Security, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Fall 2000), p. 88.
  • 6Mark R. Amstutz, International Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to World Politics (Boston: McGraw-Hill College, 1999), pp. 210-211.
  • 7Gordon A. Craig and Alexander L. George, Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Time, 3rd edn. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 196.
  • 8Charles W. Kegley and Gregory A. Raymond, From War to Peace: Fateful Decisions in International Politics (Peking University Press & Thomson Learning, 2003), p. 275.
  • 9Peter Viggo Jakobsen, Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy after the Cold War: A Challenge for Theory and Practice (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998), pp. 100-101.pp.20-23.
  • 10Alexander L. George, "The Role of Force in Diplomacy: A Continuing Dilemma for U.S. Foreign Policy," The Use of Force after the Cold War, ed. H. W. Brands (College Station: Texas A & M University Press, 2000), p. 81.

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部