期刊文献+

几种焦虑症状筛查量表信度和效度的比较 被引量:40

Comparative study of reliability and validity between several screening scales for anxiety
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较几种焦虑症状筛查量表的信度和效度。方法:对某三级综合医院的内、外、妇科门诊患者按比例随机抽样,使用简易焦虑问卷、医院焦虑抑郁量表、7条目广泛性焦虑量表、2条目广泛性焦虑量表、患者健康问卷的焦虑量表做问卷调查,并用国际神经精神科简式访谈问卷进行访谈。共收集有效问卷300份。随机抽取其中50例(实际有效35例),在初次访谈后的7~14 d进行重测。比较各量表的信度和效度。结果:各个量表的Cronbachα信度系数为0.796~0.932,重测信度为0.820~0.906。筛查广泛性焦虑阳性最多的是医院焦虑抑郁量表,为12例,最少的是患者健康问卷的焦虑量表,为9例。灵敏度以医院焦虑抑郁量表的75%为最高,其余均在60%左右;特异度均在85%以上。各量表的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积为0.869~0.963,以患者健康问卷的焦虑量表为最大,2条目广泛性焦虑量表为最小。结论:几种量表均具有良好的信度和效度,各有优势,在筛查焦虑症状上具有一定的价值,可以根据具体情况选用。 Objective To compare the reliability and validity of several anxiety screening scales.Methods The patients enrolled for anxiety screening were randomly selected as a certain proportion from outpatient departments of internal medicine,surgery and gynecology of a tertiary general hospital.The patients were asked to complete 6 questionaire scales: the anxiety scale,the 7-item generalized anxiety disorder scale(GAD-7),2-item generalized anxiety disorder scale(GAD-2),hospital anxiety and depression scale(HAD),and the anxiety syndrome part of the patient health questionaire(PHQ).Structured interviews were then taken according to the mini international neuropsychiatric interview(MINI).Three hundreads valid samples were collected.Fifty patients(35 of which were valid) of the 300 were chosen randomly for test-retest within 7 to 14 days after the first interview.Data were collected and analyzed for calculation and then compared the reliability and validity of the 6 scales.Results Cronbach' α coefficients of the 6 scales were between 0.796 and 0.932,and the test-retest reliability was between 0.820 and 0.906.HAD had the highest positive number(12),and the anxiety syndrome part of PHQ did the least positive number(9).The highest sensitivity was 75% in the HAD,as others were around 60%.Specificity of the 6 scales were all above 85%.The areas under relative operating characteristic(ROC) curves were between 0.869 and 0.963,with the largest in the anxiety syndrome part of the PHQ and the smallest in GAD-2.Conclusions The anxiety scale,GAD-2,GAD-7,HAD,and the anxiety syndrome part of the PHQ had good reliability and validity,and each of them had their own advantages.They all had a certain value in the screening of anxiety symptom.
出处 《内科理论与实践》 2011年第3期176-179,共4页 Journal of Internal Medicine Concepts & Practice
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(项目编号:2007CB512306) 国家高技术研究发展计划(项目编号:2008AA02Z412) 国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号:30770773 81071098) 上海市科委重点科技攻关项目(项目编号:074119520)
关键词 综合医疗机构 焦虑 量表 筛查 General hospital Anxiety symptom Screening Scale score
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].第3版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:75-77.
  • 2Demyttenaere K,Bruffaerts R,Posada-Villa J,et al.Prevalence,severity,and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys[J].JAMA,2004,291(21):2581-2590.
  • 3Goldberg D,Bridges K,Duncan-Jones P,et al.Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings[J].BMJ,1988,297(6653):897-899.
  • 4Arikian SR,Gorman JM.A review of the diagnosis,pharmacologic treatment,and economic aspects of anxiety disorders[J].Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry,2001,3(3):110-117.
  • 5叶维菲,徐俊冕.“综合性医院焦虑抑郁量表”在综合性医院病人中的应用与评价[J].中国行为医学杂志,1993,2(3):17-19. 被引量:240
  • 6Barczak P,Kane N,Andrews S,et al.Patterns of psychiatric morbidity in a genito-urinary clinic.A validation of the hospital anxiety depression scale (HAD)[J].Br J Psychiatry,1988,152(5):698-700.
  • 7Spitzer RL,Kroenke K,Williams JB.Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD:the PHQ primary care study.Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders[J].JAMA,1999,282(18):1737-1744.
  • 8何筱衍,李春波,钱洁,崔海松,吴文源.广泛性焦虑量表在综合性医院的信度和效度研究[J].上海精神医学,2010,22(4):200-203. 被引量:402
  • 9Spitzer RL,Kroenke K,Williams JB,et al.A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder:the GAD-7[J].Arch Intern Med,2006,166(10):1092-1097.
  • 10Kroenke K,Spitzer RL,Williams JB,et al.Anxiety disorders in primary care:prevalence,impairment,comorbidity,and detection[J].Ann Intern Med,2007,146 (5):317-325.

二级参考文献38

  • 1石其昌,章健民,徐方忠,费立鹏,许毅,傅永利,顾卫,周夏江,王淑敏,张滢,俞敏.浙江省15岁及以上人群精神疾病流行病学调查[J].中华预防医学杂志,2005,39(4):229-236. 被引量:297
  • 2Olfson M,Fireman B,Weissman MM,et al.Mental disorders and disability among patients in a primary care group practice.Am J Psychiatry,1997,154:1734-1740.
  • 3Roy-Byrne PP,Wagner A.Primary care perspectives on generalized anxiety disorder.J Clin Psychiatry,2004,65(suppl13):20-26.
  • 4Leon AC,Olfson M,Broadhead WE,et al.Prevalence of mental disorders in primary care:implications for screening.Arch Fam Med,1995,4:857-861.
  • 5Arikian SR,Gorman JM.A review of the diagnosis,pharmacologic treatment,and economic aspects of anxiety disorders.Primary Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry,2001,3:110-117.
  • 6Culpepper L.Use of algorithms to treat anxiety in primary care.J Clin Psychiatry,2003,64(suppl2):30-33.
  • 7L(o)we B,Unützer J,Callahan CM,et al.Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.Med Care,2004,42:1194-1201.
  • 8Spitzer RL,Kroenke K,Williams JBW,et al.A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder:the GAD-7.Arch Intern Med,2006,166:1092-1097.
  • 9DeVellis RF.Scale development:theory and applications.Newbury Park:Sage Publications,1991:18-42.
  • 10L(o)we B,Decker O,Müller S,et al.Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population.Medical Care,2008,46(3):266.

共引文献1914

同被引文献363

引证文献40

二级引证文献490

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部