期刊文献+

急性胆源性胰腺炎的治疗选择 被引量:3

Management of patients with acute billiary pancreatitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨急性胆源性胰腺炎合并持续性胆总管结石的预测指标和治疗选择。方法回顾分析广州医学院第三附属医院近10年内治疗134例急性胆源性胰腺炎的临床资料。结果134例急性胆源性胰腺炎病例中,30例经胆道造影或胆总管探查确诊胆总管结石阳性。多因素分析显示,人院时B超下胆总管直径(common bile duct,CBD size)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、总胆红素(TB)与胆总管结石显著相关。应用ROC曲线获得诊断胆总管结石的最佳预测值为:CBDsize≥10mm;ALP≥150U/L;TBI〉51.3μmol/L。结论3项预测指标均为阳性时诊断胆总管持续性结石具有统计学意义,建议行ERCP/EST或术中胆总管探查。各项诊断指标均为阴性时,建议行保守治疗,住院期间行胆囊切除术。当仅含有1、2项预测指标阳性时,需根据病例具体情况作相应胆道评估或治疗。 Objective To investigate the treatment options of acute biliary pancreatitis. Methods A retrospective review was performed in 134 consecutive patients who presented to a single tertiary care institution from 2000 to 2010 with acute biliary pancreatitis. Results Of the 134 patients, 30 had a persistent (commonbile duet, CBD) stone. Following multivariate analysis, at admission CBD size on ultrasound,alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin (TB), significantly correlated with persistent CBD stone. Receiver operator curve analysis and linear regression were applied to obtain optimal and equitable predictive values, and variables combined. Optimal values were : CBD ≥ 10 mm; AP ≥ 150 U/L; and TB ≥51.3 μmol/ L. Presence of three variables had an associated odds ratio (OR) of 29.5 ( P 〈 0.001 ) for presence of persistent CBD stone. Zero variables conferred asignificantly deereaaed probability of CBD stone, OR 0. 07 (P 〈0. 001 ). Conclusions Presence of three variables significantly correlated with persistent CBD stone. Bili- ary evaluation by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is suggested. In the absence of any positive predictive variables, cholecystectomy may be sufficient. Decisions regarding patients with one to two be made variables should occur on a case-to-case basis.
出处 《国际外科学杂志》 2011年第6期382-385,F0003,共5页 International Journal of Surgery
关键词 急性胆源性胰腺炎 胆石症 胆囊切除术 治疗 Acute biliary pancreatitis Choledocholithiasis Cholecystectomy Treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Frossard JL, Steer ML, Pastor CM. Acute pancreatitis[J]. Lancet, 2008, 371(9607) : 143-152.
  • 2Petrov MS, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, et al. Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus conservative management in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2008, 247(2) : 250-257.
  • 3Vitale GC. Early management of acute biliary pancreatitis [J]. Ann Surg, 2007, 245(1): 18-19.
  • 4Attasaranya S, Fogel EL, Lehman GA. Choledocholithiasis, ascending cholangitis, and gallstone pancreatitis[ J ]. Med Clin North Am, 2008, 92 (4) : 925 - 960.
  • 5中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺疾病学组.中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(草案)[J].胰腺病学,2004,4(1):35-38. 被引量:826
  • 6孙备,孔瑞.胆源性胰腺炎的诊治[J].肝胆外科杂志,2006,14(3):234-235. 被引量:21
  • 7Acosta JM, Katkhouda N, Debian KA. Early ductal decompression versus conservative management for gallstone pancreatitis with ampullary obstruction[J]. Ann Surg, 2006, 243(1): 33-40.
  • 8Chan T, Yaghoubian A, Rosing D. Total bilirubin is a useful predictor of persisting common bile duct stone in gallstone pancreatitis [J]. Am Surg, 2008, 74(10): 977-980.
  • 9Cohen ME, Slezak L, Wells CK. Prediction of bile duct stones and complications in biliary pancreatitis using early laboratory trends [J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001,96(12) : 3305-3311.
  • 10中华医学会外科学会胰腺外科学组,张圣道.重症急性胰腺炎诊治草案[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2002,8(2):110-111. 被引量:192

二级参考文献4

  • 1Dholakia K,Pitchumoni CS,Agarwal N.How often are liver function tests normal in acute biliary pancreatitis[J] ? J Clin Gastroenterol,2004,38:81-3.
  • 2Tenner S,Dubner H,Steinberg W.Predicting gallstone pancreatitis with laboratory aprameters:a meta-analysis[J].Am J Gastroenterol,1994,89:1863 -6.
  • 3Van Gossum A,Seferian V,Rodzynek JJ,et al.Early detection of biliary pancreatitis[J].Dig Dis Sci,1984,29:97-101.
  • 4姜洪池,孙备,张伟辉,许军,乔海泉,赵金鹏.重症急性胰腺炎手术时机及手术指征的探讨(附172例报告)[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2000,6(2):127-128. 被引量:44

共引文献1030

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部