摘要
目的:比较不同心率水平256层CT前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉成像的图像质量。方法:对临床拟诊冠心病的200例患者行256层CT前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉成像,根据心率分为两组:第1组,50次/min≤心率<70次/min(n=99);第2组,70次/min≤心率<90次/min(n=111)。用双盲法评价两组的图像质量。结果:第1组患者可评估的冠状动脉节段为1 410个(94.95%),其中1 123个(79.65%)节段图像质量优秀,253个(17.94%)节段图像质量为良,34个(2.41%)节段图像质量为差;第2组可评估的冠状动脉节段为1 571个(94.35%),其中1 208个(76.89%)节段图像质量优秀,309个(19.67%)节段图像质量为良,54个(3.44%)节段图像质量为差,两组之间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:心率在90次/min以下的患者能进行256层CT前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉成像,图像质量能满足诊断要求。
Objective:To compare image quality of patients with different heart rate(HR)by 256-silce computed tomography coro-nary angiography(CTCA)using prospective electrocardiogram(ECG)-gating.Methods:Two hundred patients with suspected coronary artery disease underwent 256-slice CTCA using prospective ECG-gating.Patients were divided into two groups according to their HR:the first group(50 b.p.m≤HR 〈 70 b.p.m,n = 99)and the second group(70 b.p.m≤HR 〈 90 b.p.m,n = 111).Image quality was e-valuated between those two groups.Results:Total 1410(94.95%)segments of the first group were evaluated,among which 1 123(79.65%)segments were classified as excellent,253(17.94%)were good and 34(2.48%)were bad.Total 1 571(94.35%)segments of the second group could be evaluated,1 208(76.89%)segments were classified as excellent,309(19.67%)were good and 54(3.44%)were bad.Conclusion:The patients with HR 〈 90 b.p.m can undergo CTCA using prospective ECG-gating.Image quality can satisfy the diagnostic requirement.
出处
《南京医科大学学报(自然科学版)》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第6期856-859,共4页
Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)