期刊文献+

巴尔的摩案及思考 被引量:4

Arguments & Thoughts on "Baltimore Case
下载PDF
导出
摘要 巴尔的摩案是美国科学界发生的与科学不端行为有关的一个著名案例。在长达十年之久的审查及定案中不仅涉及面广,而且还惊动了政府部门和经济情报局,由此也引发了科学界对政府参与的种种看法。调查科学不端行为的机构ORI也因在这项案件调查中的失败而面临种种困境。本文对这一案件的经过作了描述,并就其中有关的争论和思考提出了看法。 Baltimore Case'is a famous case on misconduct in science. During its 10-year investigation, ithad not only been widely spread, but also intervened by Congress and Secret Service. Office of Research integrity (ORI), the agent dealing with charges on misconduct in science, experienced agreat deal of difficulties after its failure in the investigation. This article describes the process ofthis case, and puts forward some idea on relevant issues.
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 1999年第6期33-38,32,共7页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1李浩春.ISBN7-5025—2319—7·分析化学手册(第二版)[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1999.260.
  • 2.ISBN-5025-2736-2/R·60.中国药典[S].,..

同被引文献86

  • 1徐杰,李正风,陈敬全.国家自然科学基金面上项目资助额的地区分布规律[J].中国基础科学,2007(4):43-45. 被引量:6
  • 2秦惠基.巴尔的摩事件的启示[J].医学与哲学(A),1992,26(6):1-4. 被引量:3
  • 3Mark S Frankel.A Public Policy Perspective on Research Integrity and Misconduct[J].Stephen Erickscn.Research Management Review,Winter 1997,9 (2):19-24.
  • 4Office of Research Integrity.Former Scientific Misconduct Begulations-42 CFR Part 50,Subpart A:May 1989-May 2005[EB/OL].http://ori.dhhs.gov/misconduct/reg_subpart_a.shtml,2006-04-25,2007-07-23.
  • 5Public Health Service.Responsibility of PHS Awardee and Applicant Institutions for Dealing With and Beportiag Possible Misconduct in Science.NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts[EB/OL],September 1,1989,18 (30):2,1989-09-01,2007-07-23.
  • 6The United States Congress.Health Research Extension Act of 1985[EB/OL].Public Law 99-158,NOV.20,1985:874-875.http://history.nih.guv/01Docs/historical/documents/PL99-158.pdf,1985-11-20,2007-07-23.
  • 7Public Health Service.Interim Public Health Service Policies and Procedures for Dealing With Possible Misconduct in Science[R].NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts,July 18,1986,15(11):2.[EB/OL] http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1986-07-18.Vol15,No.11.pdf,1986-07-18,2007-07-23.
  • 8Alan R Price.Definitions and Boundaries of Research Misconduct:Perspectives from A Federal Government Viewpoint[J].The Journal of Higher Education,May-Jun.,1994,65 (3):290-292.
  • 9National Science Foundation,Misconduct in Science and Engineering:Final Rule[EB/OL].1991:2.http://www.research.colostate.edu/rcoweb/mis/mis_nsf_mserr.htm,1987-07-01,2007-07-23.
  • 10National Science Foundation.Responsible Conduct of Science:NSF Misconduct in Science and Engineering Research Regulations[EB/OL].http://www-ogsr.ucsd.edu/ethics/policy/nsf_policy.htm,1991-04-26,2007-07-23.

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部