期刊文献+

多层螺旋CT后处理技术诊断主动脉夹层 被引量:4

Post-processing techniques of MSCT in diagnosis of aortic dissection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨64层螺旋CT后处理技术诊断主动脉夹层的价值。方法 87例主动脉夹层患者均接受64层螺旋CT血管造影,在工作站用动脉期薄层图像进行图像后处理,比较3D成像中VRT自由切割成像及仿真内镜(VE)与其他后处理方法对腹腔干以上水平内膜破口的显示率。结果 87例中,De BakeyⅠ型19例,Ⅱ型5例,Ⅲ型63例。各种重建方法对内膜破口的显示率由高到低依次为VRT自由切割成像(81/87,93.10%)、MPR(80/87,91.95%)、CPR(79/87,90.80%)、轴位+VE(79/87,90.80%)、轴位(78/87,89.66%)、VR(41/87,47.13%)、MIP(22/87,25.29%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=106.376,P<0.001)。结论 CTVE能立体直观地显示破口位置,结合轴位图像可提高对破口的显示率;VRT自由切割成像对破口显示率较VR明显提高,优于MPR。 Objective To investigate the value of post-processing techniques in 64-slice spiral CT in diagnosis of aortic dissection.Methods Totally 87 patients with aortic dissection underwent 64-slice spiral CT angiography.In the arterial phase,thin-layer images were post-processed with workstation,and the display rate in 3D free cut VRT imaging,CT virtual endoscopy(VE) and other post-processing methods on intimal tear above the level of celiac were compared.Results De Bakey Ⅰ type was found in 19,Ⅱ in 5 and Ⅲ in 63 patients.Display rate of the intimal tear of VRT free cut was 93.10%(81/87),of MPR was 91.95%(80/87),of CPR was 90.80%(79/87),of axial view combined with VE was 90.80%(79/87),of axial view was 89.66%(78/87),of VR was 47.13%(41/87) and of MIP was 25.29%(22/87),from high to low(χ2=106.376,P0.001).Conclusion CTVE combined with axial images can improve the display rate of the break in aortic dissection.Compared with VR and MPR,VRT free rate cut can increase the display rate of the break significantly.
出处 《中国介入影像与治疗学》 CSCD 2011年第4期275-279,共5页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy
关键词 主动脉疾病 体层摄影术 VRT自由切割成像 仿真内镜 Aortic diseases Tomography VRT free clip like Virtual endoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1孙健鸣,师天雄,王深明,吕发金,赵渝,时德.64层螺旋CT在主动脉夹层病变实验研究中的应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2008,24(S1):38-39. 被引量:4
  • 2Erbel R, Alfomso F, Boileau C, et al. Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. Eur Heart J, 2001,22(19) :1642-1681.
  • 3. Lars G, Sherif B, Andrew C. Intimal tear without hematoma an important variant of aortic dissection that can elude current ima- ging techniques. Circulation, 1999,99(1) : 1331-1336.
  • 4Golledge J, Eagle KA. Acute aortic dissection. Lancet, 2008,372 (9632) :55-66.
  • 5Robinson PN, Booms P. The molecular pathogenesis of the Marfan syndrome. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2001,58(11) : 1698-1707.
  • 6Nienaber CA, Eagle KA. Aortic dissection : new frontiers in diag- nosis and management: Part I: from etiology to diagnostic strate- gies. Circulation, 2003,108(5) :628-635.
  • 7. Lepage MA, Quint LE, Sonnad SS, et al. Aortic dissection: CT features that distinguish true lumen from false lumen. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001,177(1) :207-211.
  • 8Kang SG, Lee DY, Maeda M, et al. Aortic dissection: percuVa neous management with a separating stent graft-preliminary re- sults. Radiology, 2001,220(9):533-539.
  • 9Hagan PG, Nieraber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The interna- tional registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD) : new insights in- to an old disease. JAMA, 2000,283(7):897-903.
  • 10Zaiping J, Xiang F, Junmin B. Endovascular graft exclusion for thoraortic dissections. J Med Col PLA, 2000,15(1) :7-9.

二级参考文献1

共引文献3

同被引文献50

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部