《创业史》接受现象研究

The Phenomenon of Acceptance in Chuangyeshi of Works

《创业史》的接受曾是17年时期一桩重要的公案,直至1980年代后才以严家炎的视野为既定视野,柳青的维护淡出了结。其实,二人维护的视野各不相同。严家炎的着力点是"写得怎样",柳青回答的是"怎样写"和"为什么这样写",虽然各具视野,但由于"怎样写"和"为什么这样写"带来的更多是教训,而"写得怎样"坚守的是文学的操守,它不仅反映出"17年文学"接受所遭遇的尴尬与历史的沉重,也彰显出朴素的文学道理。

The acceptance of Chuangyeshi of pioneering works is an important public record in the 17-years period.It is not until late 1980s that it was settled by the established horizon provided by Yan Jiayan.In fact,each of them has their horizons.Yan Jiayan focuses on ＂how he writes＂,while Liu Qing＇s purpose is to answer the question ＂how to write＂ and ＂why write in this way＂.Though each of them has their own horizons,the question ＂how to writes＂ and ＂why write in this way＂ brings about more lessons,while the question ＂how he writes＂ shows a literary persistence.The discrepancy between the ＂in＂ and the ＂out＂ not only reflects the embarrassment an historical heaviness occurred to the 17-years literature,but also shows some plain truth of literature.