期刊文献+

影响1型肝肾综合征患者预后因素的临床研究 被引量:2

The Clinical Research of Prognostic Factors for Patients with Type 1 Hepatorenal Syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:寻找影响1型肝肾综合征(HRS)患者预后的危险因素,为降低HRS发病率,提高临床疗效,判断预后提供参考。方法:回顾性分析105例HRS患者的病历资料,采用1996年国际腹水联合会诊断标准分为1型HRS和2型HRS,记录所有入选患者人口统计学指标、生化指标、治疗情况和预后,计算终末期肝病(MELD)评分和简化MELD评分,比较分析1型HRS和2型HRS的MELD评分的起始值、中位值和平均值,了解两种类型HRS的差异;将血肌酐、胆红素、白蛋白、MELD评分等可能的危险因素纳入时间依存风险比例模型探讨影响1型HRS预后的因素。结果:(1)共105例患者入选,男56例,女49例,平均年龄(50±12)岁。其中1型HRS68例,占64.76%;2型HRS37例,占35.24%。随访时间为50(1~489)d,随访期间,85例死亡,3例失访,2例行肝移植,17例仍存活。(2)1型HRS组的MELD中位值和平均值显著高于2型HRS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Kaplan-Meier风险模型生存分析显示1型HRS的预后较2型HRS差,死亡分析明显增加;(3)时间依存风险比例模型分析显示,随访期间血肌酐和总胆红素每升高1单位,1型HRS患者死亡风险分别增加29.3%和4.2%;血白蛋白每降低1单位,1型HRS患者死亡风险增加30.1%;INR和传统MELD评分的变化与1型HRS的预后无关;但简化MELD每变化1个单位,死亡风险增加24.2%。结论:总胆红素、血肌酐、血白蛋白是影响1型HRS预后的重要因素;传统MELD评分并不能预测1型HRS的预后,而简化MELD值的变化却是影响1型HRS患者预后的重要因素。 Objective:We aimed to know the significant predictors of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS).In addition to the initial model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores and biochemistry parameters,we want to further investigate the prognostic importance of changes in MELD scores and biochemistry parameters over time for patients with type 1 HRS.Methods:This is a retrospective study,data from type 1 HRS patients were incorporated,including their demographic,clinical progression,all recording biochemical parameters,therapeutic methods,and outcomes.MELD score simple were calculated by CRE and TBI.Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival curves were calculated for patients with type 1 and type 2 HRS.The probable danger factors,such as creatinine (CRE),total bilirubin(TBI),were included into the time-dependent proportional hazards model to get the prognostic factors.Results:A total of 105 patients were included in the study.According to the definition of the International Ascites Club,68 patients(or 64.76%) had type 1 HRS whereas 37(or 35.24%) had type 2 HRS.According to the multivariate COX proportional hazards regression model,either initial biochemistry parameters or MELD scores were not significantly associated with prognosis.By time-dependent proportional hazards model,each point elevated in CRE and total TBI levels during the admission increased mortality risk by 29.3% and 4.2%,respectively.Increasing albumin level during the admission showed its protective value.Changes in MELD score simple during the admission were significant predictor for patients with type 1 HRS.Conclusion:In patients with type 1 HRS,changes in TBI,CRE,and albumin level during the admission were associated with prognosis.Changes in MELD score simple is superior to initial and changes in MELD scores to predict prognosis in patients with type 1 HRS.
出处 《中国中西医结合肾病杂志》 2011年第6期513-515,共3页 Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Nephrology
关键词 肝肾综合征 预后 Hepatorenal syndrome Prognostic factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Arroyo V, Gines P, Gerbes AL, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrho-.
  • 2Schepke M, Appenrodt B, Heller J, et al. Prognostic factors for patients with cirrhosis and kidney dysfunction in the era of MELD : results of a prospective study. Liver Int, 2006,26 ( 3 ) : 834 - 839.
  • 3Mitzner S, Klammt S, Stange J, et al. Albumin regeneration in liv- er support - comparison of different methods. Ther Apher Dial, 2006,10(2) :108 - 117.
  • 4Alessandria C, Ozdogan O, Guevara M, et al. MELD score and clinical type predict prognosis in hepatorenal syndrome: rele- vance to liver transplantation. Hepatology, 2004,41 ( 6 ) : 1282 - 1289.
  • 5Sundaram V, A1 - Osaimi AM, Lewis JJ, et al. Severe prolonga- tion of the INR in spur cell anemia of cirrhosis : true : true and related ? Dig Dis Sci. 2006,51 (7) : 1203 - 1205.
  • 6Bambha K, Kim WR, Kremers WK, et al. Predicting survival a- mong patients listed for liver transplantation: an assessment of erial MELD measurements. Am J Transplant, 2004, 4 ( 11 ) :1798 - 1804.
  • 7Huo TI, Wu JC, Lin HC, et al. Evaluation of the increase in mod- el for end - stage liver disease ( Delta MELD) score over time as a prognostic predictor in patients with advanced cirrhosis: risk factor analysis and comparison with initial MELD and Child - Turnotte - Push scnre. 1 Henato1.2005.42 ( 7 ) :826 - 832.
  • 8Merion RM, Wolfe RA, Dykstra DM, et al. Longitudinal assess- ment of mortality risk among candidates for liver transplantation. Liver Transplant,2003,9 ( 1 ) : 12 - 18.

同被引文献13

  • 1Salerno F,Gerbes A,Gines P,et al.Diagnosis,prevention and treat-ment of hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis[J].Gut,2007,56(9):1310.
  • 2Schepke M,Appenrodt B,Heller J,et al.Prognostic factors for pa-tients with cirrhosis and kidney dysfunction in the era of MELD:results of a prospective study[J].Liver Int,2006,26:834-839.
  • 3Alessandria C,Ozdogan O,Guevara M,et al.MELD score and clinical type predict prognosis in hepatorenal syndrome:relevance to liver trans-plantation[J].Hepatology,2004,41:1282-1289.
  • 4Alessandria C,Ozdogan O,Guevara M,et al.MELD score and clinical type predict prognosis in hepatorenal syndrome:relevance to liver trans-plantation[J].Hepatology,2005,41(6):1282-1289.
  • 5江宏峰,吴金明,金颖,等.胆肾综合征83例临床特征分析[J].中国实用科杂志,2010,30(3):253-255.
  • 6秦向荣.生长抑素治疗Ⅰ型肝肾综合征的疗效观察[J].药学与临床研究,2007,15(6):470-472. 被引量:4
  • 7严颖,麦丽,林炳亮,江元森,赵志新,高志良.肝肾综合征121例COX生存分析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2006,27(B04):183-185. 被引量:4
  • 8陈道荣,陶小红,王丕龙.Ⅰ型肝肾综合征的临床分析[J].胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2009,18(3):231-232. 被引量:4
  • 9闫涛,李克,王慧芬.肝肾综合征的发病机制[J].实用肝脏病杂志,2009,12(3):237-240. 被引量:11
  • 10孙红花.肝肾综合征临床分析[J].中国医药指南,2009,7(21):47-48. 被引量:1

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部