期刊文献+

美国对科学探究教学的界定及分析框架简介 被引量:8

A Brief Introduction to the Definition and Analysis Protocol of Inquiry Science Instruction in America
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国内外科学教育领域关于探究教学的研究存在概念界定模糊和无有效评价工具等问题。美国国家科学基金会在“探究综述项目”中,制定了探究教学的操作定义和简单的分析框架,有研究者提出了用来评价课堂探究教学的多维分析框架,这两部分研究工作可供我国科学探究教学研究借鉴。建议在已有实证研究的基础上,进一步明确探究教学的特征和元素,设计适合我国国情的课堂探究教学分析框架。 There exist some problems in the field of international science education, such as inexplicit idea about inquiry instruction and absence of analysis protocol. In recent years, the Inquiry Synthesis Project conceptualizes inquiry science instruction in a more explicit way. Meanwhile, some American researchers promote an analysis protocol to assess inquiry instruction. In the future, we could continue our research in two ways: on one hand, explicating the features and elements of inquiry science instruction; on the other hand, designing effective inquiry instruction observation protocols.
出处 《课程.教材.教法》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第7期97-100,共4页 Curriculum,Teaching Material and Method
基金 中国教育学会物理教学专业委员会课题“中学物理有效探究教学与教师教学观念和教学能力发展的系统研究”(课题编号:080305)研究成果之一
关键词 科学教育 探究教学 分析框架 science education inquiry instruction analysis protocol
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Daphne D. Minner, Abigail Jurist Levy, Jeanne Century. Conceptualizing Inquiry Science Instruction [C]. The Inquiry Synthesis Project, Center for Science Education, Education Development Center, Inc. http: //cse. edc. org/ products/inquirysynth/2006-04.
  • 2Daphne D. Minner, Abigail Jurist Levy, Jeanne Century. Operationalizing the Inquiry Science Instruction Coding Process [C] . The Inquiry Synthesis Project, Center for Science Education, Education Development Center, Inc. http: // cse. edc. org/products/inquirysynth/. 2006-04.
  • 3Riggs I M, Enochs L G. Toward the Development of An Elementary Teacher's Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument [J] . Science Education, 1990, 74 (6) : 625-637.
  • 4Sawada D, Piburn M, Falconer K, Turley J, Benford R, Bloom I, Judson E. Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) : TRAINING GUIDE [R]. Arizona Collaborative for Excellence in the Preparation of Teachers (ACETP) Technical Report No. IN00-2, Arizona State University, 2000-03.
  • 5Horizon Research. Inside the Classroom Observation and Analytic Protocol [EB/OL]. Horizon Research, Inc, http://www. horizon-research. com/instruments/, 2000-11-30.
  • 6Karen Beerer, Alec M. Bodzin. Promoting Inquiry- Based Science Instruction: The Validation of the Science Teacher Inquiry Rubric ( STIR ) [ C ]. Association for the Education of Teachers of Science (AETS) Annual Meeting, Nashville, TN, 2004, January: 8-11.
  • 7Sampson V. The Science Management Observation Protocol [J]. The Science Teacher, 2004, 71 (10): 30-33.
  • 8Marshall J C, Smart J, Horton R M. The Design and Validation of EQUIP: An Instrument to Assess Inquiry-based Instruction [J]. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2010, 8 (2): 299-321.
  • 9Marshall J C. The Creation, Validation, and Reliability Associated with the EQUIP (Electronic Quality of Inquiry Protocol) : A Measure of Inquiry- Based Instruction [ C]. National Association of Researchers of Science Teaching ( NARST ) Conference. Orange County, CA, 2009.

同被引文献82

引证文献8

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部