期刊文献+

欧洲高等教育机构分类框架解读 被引量:5

Understanding the Framework of Classifying European Institutions of Higher Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 欧洲高等教育机构分类法是欧盟高等教育政策影响下的直接产物,它通过教学、学生、科研、知识交换、地区参与、国际化导向6个维度共23个指标对欧洲所有高等教育机构进行分类。研究表明:注重多元主体的民主参与和分类方法的选择、重视指标体系设计、不盲目照搬已有分类法是该分类法的成功经验所在。 As the direct result of the European higher education policy, "Classifying European Institutions For Higher Education" has been developed. It classifies all the European HEIs by 23 indexes of six dimensions including teaching and learning profile, student profile, research involvement, regional engagement, involvement in knowledge exchange and international orientation. It indicates that when classifying HEIs researchers should absorb multi-agent democratic participation, choose appropriate classification methods, focus on designing the index system of classification and carefully learn experience from existing classifications.
作者 雷家彬 沈红
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第7期40-44,48,共6页 International and Comparative Education
关键词 欧洲高等教育机构分类 透明工具 多样化 高等学校分类 Classifying European Institutions For Higher Education (CEIHE) U-map transparent tool diversity classification of HEIs
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Frans van Vught. Developing a Classification of Higher Education Institutions in Europe [ EB/OL]. http://www.oecd. org/dataoecd/9/43/37800154.pdf, 2010-05 -20.
  • 2Jeroen Bartelse & Frans van Vught. Institutional Profiles: Towards a Typology of Higher Educalion Institutions in Europe. IAU Horizons. 2007.13( 2-3 ): 9-11.
  • 3Jeroen Huisman & Frans van Vught. Diversity in European Higher Education: Historical Trends and Current Policies. In: Frans van Vught (ed.). Mapping the Higher Education Landscape. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009. 35.
  • 4U-map. The Methodology [EB/OL]. http: //www. u-map. eu/methodology.doc/. 2010-05-15.
  • 5U-map. Overview of Dimensions and Indicators [EB/OL]. http://u-map.org/U-Map%20dimensions% 20and% 20indi- cators%20overview.pdf, 2009-10-31.
  • 6OECD.GLOSSARY [ EB/OL ].http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/ 45/17/33692376.pdf, 2010-05 -23.
  • 7谢亚兰,刘莉,刘念才.多样性:欧洲高校分类的灵魂[J].比较教育研究,2010,31(4):41-46. 被引量:11
  • 8The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. About The Carnegie Classifications[EB/OL]. www. carnegiefoundation.org/classifications. 2010-04-15.
  • 9Kenneth Bailey. Typologies and Taxonomies: an Introduction to Classification Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994. 2.
  • 10潘金林.高校分类:高等教育多样性发展的重要导向[J].教育发展研究,2010,30(1):34-37. 被引量:7

二级参考文献19

  • 1刘广明.高等教育哲学视野中的教育公平[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,40(1):169-173. 被引量:18
  • 2刘献君.建设教学服务型大学——兼论高等学校分类[J].教育研究,2007,28(7):31-35. 被引量:191
  • 3Institutional Profiles towards a Typology of Higher Education Institutions in Europe.2005.5,8.http ://www.fulbright.nl/cache/ce/ce4e8a37da5a3aaf412e09f5bb4672b6/Institutional_Profiles,_towards_a_typology, pdf. 2009-04-09.
  • 4The Center for Higher Education Policy Studies ( CHEPS ), University of Twente, the Netherlands in Partnership with the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, The University of Aveiro, Portugal; and the German Rectors Conference (HRK). Mapping Diversity-Developing a European Classification of Higher Education Institutions. 2008.7-8, 34, 10, 7, 12, 4, 16, 56-76.
  • 5Towards a Classification.http ://www.utwente.nl/cheps/research/projects/ceihe/. 2009-04-09.
  • 6Frans van Vught. Diversity and Differentiation in Higher Education Systems Challenges for the Knowledges Society. Oslo, 13 November, 2007,2.http ://www.uhr.no/documents/ Fran_van_Vught_text.pdf. 2009-04-09.
  • 7Classifying European Institutions for Higher Education (stage II ).http ://www.utwente.nl/cheps/research/projects/ceihe/. 2009-04-10.
  • 8程莹,刘少雪,刘念才.美国卡内基2005高校分类的借鉴与启示.http://wwws.moe.gcv.cn/edoas/website18/37/info24937.htm.2009-04-01.
  • 9Carnegie Classifications Data File.http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/index, asp? key=809. 2009-05- 10.
  • 10潘懋元.我看应用型本科院校定位问题[J].教育发展研究,2007,27(07A):34-36. 被引量:172

共引文献16

同被引文献79

引证文献5

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部