期刊文献+

美国防范科研不端行为的基层监管机制

On the foot-layer mechanism of oversee and administration against research misconduct in the United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于科研不端行为的监管问题,除了美国国会与司法部门的相应对策、联邦政府与非政府各部门的顶层监管以及卫生部OR I等专门监管机制以外,还存在一个基层监管机制。这具体由大学、研究机构和医院等基层组织的相关机制构成。这种基层监管机制在整个美国科研不端行为监管机制中居于基层地位并起着基础支撑和具体执行作用。 About the problem of oversee and administration against research misconduct in the United States,besides the corresponding countermeasures from the Congress and judicial department,the top-layer mechanism of oversee and administration in every departments and agencies of the federal government and non-government,and the specialized mechanism of oversee and administration in HHS,there is surely a foot-layer mechanism of oversee and administration consisted of all universities,research institutes and hospitals etc..It is a foot-layer status and playing an important role of basic support and concrete implement against research misconduct in the United States.
作者 蒋美仕
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第7期973-977,共5页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(10BZX028) 中南大学研究生教育"创新工程"--"研究生课程建设"重点项目(1960-71131430026) 湖南省学位与研究生教育教学改革一般立项资助课题(07B04)
关键词 科研不端行为 基层监管机制 基础支撑 具体执行 美国 research misconduct foot-layer mechanism of oversee and administration basic support concrete implement the United States
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) , Federal Policy on Research Misconduct [ R]. Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 235/Wednesday, December 6, 2000/Notices, p. 76263.
  • 2Wright D E, Titus S L, Cornelison J B. Mentoring andresearch misconduct: an analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases[ J]. Science and Engineering Eth- ics, 2008,14(3) :323 -336.
  • 3University of maine, policy and procedures on alleged misconduct in research and other scholarly activities [R]. APPROVED: September 17, 1999, Revised: A- pril 14, 2006,2 - 3.
  • 4Institutional Review Board [ EB/OL]. http://www. cancer, gov/Templates/db_alpha, aspx? CdrID = 44679.
  • 5White R F. Institutional review board mission creep: the common rule, social science, and the nanny state [ J ]. The Independent Review, 2007, Spring:562.
  • 6Iverson Margot, Franke Mark, Siang Sanyin. Scientific societies and research integrity: what are they doing and how well are they doing it? [ J]. Science and Engineer- ing Ethics, 2003,9(2):141 -158.
  • 7Anne Hudson Jones. Can authorship policies help pre- vent scientific misconduct? what role for scientific socie- ties? [ J~ Science and Engineering Ethics, 2003,9 ( 2 ) : 243 - 256.
  • 8Callaham M L. Journal policy on ethics in scientific publication[ J ]. Annals of Emergency Medicine,2003, 41(1) :82 -89.
  • 9Biggs A R. The journal's role in scientific misconduct [ J ]. Phytopathology News, 2004,38 (2) : 17 - 19.
  • 10Wager E. Ethical publishing: the innocent author's guide to avoiding misconduct [ J]. Menopause Interna- tional, 2007,13(3) :98 - 102.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部