期刊文献+

基于综合限制函数超限的飞行事故虚拟再现系统设计 被引量:2

Flight Accident Reconstruction System Based on Synthetic Parameter Restriction Function
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对飞行事故再现技术中分析方法的不准确性和不直观性,结合飞参分析与分布式仿真技术,研究了事故再现中的关键分析技术,以决定性参数的综合限制函数超限作为事故最终发生的原因;在此基础上,设计了基于虚拟现实技术的事故仿真系统.该系统可以在定量分析事故发生过程的同时进行飞行状态3D演示;最后对某型低空突防战机副翼位置传感器失效引起的飞行事故进行了仿真分析,从数学层面以高度综合限制函数作为判断事故发生的依据,准确直观地解算并再现了事故发生后的状态变化情况.调查结果表明,左副翼卡滞状况下引起的位置传感器共模故障为事故发生的原因,其中高度限制器对事故的发生起了促进作用. In order to solve the problem of inaccuracy and lack of visualization in current flight accident analysis system,we built an accident reconstruction system based on the technology of virtual reality and distributed simulation.This system takes overrunning of decisive flight parameter function as the essential cause of the flight accident.It can analyze the process of accident quantitatively,and simulates flight state simultaneously using 3D visualization technique.We analyzed an accident that happened when one fighter plane was taking low altitude penetration mission,taking the synthetic restriction function of altitude as the guidance of determining the fighter's changing state.At the same time the simulation system demonstrated the accident calculating process precisely and vividly using virtual reality technology.The results suggested the accident may be caused by common mode failure of aileron actuating cylinder blocking and position sensor malfunction,and the height limiter might induce its happening.
出处 《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期1166-1172,共7页 Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics
基金 国家自然科学基金(70671106 60572172)
关键词 事故再现 飞参综合限制函数 分布仿真 共模故障 虚拟现实 accident reconstruction synthetic parameter restriction function distributed simulation common mode failure virtual reality
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1刘汉辉.安全飞行原理[M].北京:中国民航出版社,1993..
  • 2Reuther J, Thompson R, Pulsonetti M, et al. External computational aerothermodynamic analysis for the STS-107 accident investigation [R]. Washington, D C: AIAA 2004-1384, 2004.
  • 3Athiniotis N, Lombardo D, Clark G. Simulation, assessment and technical conclusions from a major accident investigation [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2010, 17:353-360.
  • 4Crider D A. Control system failure simulation for accident investigation [R]. Washington, D C: AIAA 2005-6113, 2005.
  • 5Crider D A. Simulation as an atmospheric motion analysis tool for accident investigation [R]. Washington, D C: AIAA 2004 -5034, 2004.
  • 6Bower D R, O'Callaghan J. Utilization of CFD in the American airlines flight 587 accident investigation [R]. Washington, D C:AIAA 2008-6905, 2008.
  • 7Kowaleczko G, Sobieraj W. Reconstruction of an aircraft accident using an inverse technique [R]. Washington, D C: AIAA 2004 5036, 2004.
  • 8Renze K J, Crider D A. Simulation and kinematics parameter extraction in the investigation of a commuter accident [R]. Washington, D C: AIAA 2004-5036, 2004.
  • 9Milosovski G. Bil C, Simon P. Improvement of aircraft accident investigation through expert systems [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46(1) : 10-24.
  • 10Milosovski G, Bil C, Kosevski M. Application of expert systems to aircraft accident investigation [R]. Washington, D C: AIAA 2008-181, 2008.

二级参考文献20

共引文献13

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部