期刊文献+

白内障超声乳化术中扭动模式与传统爆破模式的临床研究 被引量:2

Comparison of torsional mode and conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulisification for cataract surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较并探讨扭动模式与传统爆破模式对白内障超声乳化术后的影响。方法前瞻f生随机对照研究。对2008年1月至2009年1月在上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院按照手术日登记将接受白内障超声乳化手术的患者随机分为2组,扭动模式组94例,传统爆破模式组94例,分别使用扭动模式和爆破模式进行超声乳化手术。术中记录超声时间(Ultrasound Time,UST),累计分散能量(Cumula—tive Dissipated Energy,CDE)和手术并发症。患者术后1周、1月、3月接受复诊和随访。术后检查项目包括最佳矫正视力和角膜内皮计数。结果根据Emery白内障核分级:扭动组I+II、III、IV级以上核的超声时间分别是(31.06±14.29)s、(35.72±19.74)s、(74.11±41.50)s;爆破组I+II、III、IV级以上核的超声时间分别是(47.3±17.58)s、(53.34±19.51)s、(84.54±15.45)s,两者之间差异有统计学意义(F值分别为3.845、5.643、7.814,P〈0.05)。扭动组I+II、III、IV级以上核的CDE值分别是11.2±5.33、12.42±5.49、18.19±1.31;爆破组I+II、III、IV级以上核的CDE值分别12.65±5.71、15.64±9.35、42.5±3.01,两者间差异有统计学意义(F值分别为8.800、9.386、9.388,P〈0.05)。手术3月的最佳矫正视力扭动组O.72±0.21,爆破组0.70±0.18,两者间无明显差异(P〉0.05)。术后1周、1月、3月的角膜内皮细胞计数,扭动组分别为(2149±199)、(2222±177)、(2313±161)个/mm^2爆破组分别为(2055±218)、(2084±175)、(2259±179)个/mm2,各组间差异有统计学意义(F值分别为6.297、6.272、5.957,P〈0.05)。结论白内障超声乳化手术中采用扭动模式可以有效减少能量和缩短时间,减轻患者角膜内皮的损伤,是一种安全有效地手术模式。 Objective To compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of cataract surgery performed with torsional mode and conventional ultrasound mode using the Infiniti Vision System. Methods Randomized comparative study. A total of 188 eyes were assigned to phacoemulisification by torsional mode or conventional ultrasound mode according to the appointed day. The surgery was performed by an experienced surgeon, and the outcomes were evaluated by an examiner who was masked to treatment assignments. Primary outcome measures were US time (UST), cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), and surgical complication. Patients were seen 7, 30, and 90 days after surgery. Postoperative outcome measures were the final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the change in endothelial cell count. Results The US group had 94 eyes and torsional group 94 eyes. All patients completed the follow-up visits. In the eyes with nucleus density grades of I±II, III, IV and above, the mean UST was 31.06± 14.29 s, 35.72± 19.74 s, 74.11± 41.50 s, respectively in the US group and 47.3± 17.58 s, 53.34± 19.51 s, 84.54± 15.45 s respectively in the torsional group (P 〈0.05); the mean CDE was 11.2± 5.33, 12.42± 5.49, 18.19± 1.31 respectively in the US group and 12.65±5.71, 15.64±9.35, 42.5± 3.01 respectively in the torsional group (P 〈0.05). Postoperative 90 days, the mean BCVA were 0.72± 0.21 in torsional group and 0.70±_ 0.18 in US group (P 〉0.05). At 7 days, 30 days and 90 days, the mean central corneal endothelial cell count was 2149± 199, 2222± 177, 2313± 161 respectively in the US group and 2055± 218, 2084± 175, 2259± 179 respectively in the torsional group (P 〈0.05). Conclusions The torsional mode can provide more effective lens removal with a lower level of phacoemulsification time and energy.
出处 《中国实用眼科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期670-673,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
基金 上海市重点学科建设项目资助(S30205)
关键词 白内障 超声乳化 扭动模式 cataract phacoemulisification ultrasound mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Liu Y,Zeng M,Liu X,et al. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification Radomized comparative clini- cal study[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2007,33:287-292.
  • 2Kelmau CD.Phac0- emulsification and aspiration; a new technique of cataract removal; a preliminary report [J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1967,64 : 23-35.
  • 3Polaek FM. Sugar A. The phaco- emulsification procedure. II. Corneal Endothelial changes[J]. Invest Ophthalmol, 1976,15(6): 458-469.
  • 4Krey I-IF. Ultrasonic turbulences at the phaco- emulsification tip [J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1989,15 : 343.
  • 5Beltrame G, Salvatat M, Driussi G,et al. Effect of incision size and site on corneal endothelial changes in cataract surgery[J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 2002,28(4) : 118-125.
  • 6Geul JL, Va'zquez M, Luceana J, et al. Phaco rolling te- chinique[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2004,30:2043-2045.
  • 7McNeill JI. Flared phacoemulsifieation tips to decrease ultrasound time and energy in cataract surgery [J]. J cataract Refract Surg, 2001,27:1433-1436.
  • 8Rose AD, Kanada V, Thermal imaging study comparing pha- coemulsification with the Sovereigh WhiteStar System to the Legacy with AdvanTec and NeoSoniX System[J], Am J Ophthal- mol, 2006,141:322-326.
  • 9Davision JA. Ultrasonic powere reduction during phacoemulsifica- tion using adjunctive NeoSoniX Technology[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005,31 : 1011-1019.
  • 10刘奕志,程冰.爆破模式的超声乳化白内障吸除术[J].中华眼科杂志,2004,40(4):239-242. 被引量:27

二级参考文献20

  • 1Liu Y,Zeng M,Liu X.et al.Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification:randomized comparative clinical study.J Cataract Refract Surg,2007,33:287-292.
  • 2Vasavada V,Raj SM,Vasavada AR.Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification Observational study.J Cataract Refract Surg,2007,33:1019-1024.
  • 3Chylack LT Jr,Wolfe JR,Singer DM,et al.The lens opacities classification system Ⅲ.Arch Ophthalmol,1993,11:831-836.
  • 4Mencucci R,Ambresini S,Ponchietti C,et al.Ultrasound thermal damage to rabbit corneas after simulated phacoemulsification.J Cataract Refract surg,2005,31:2180-2186.
  • 5Stevens G Jr,Long B,Hamann JM,et al.Erbium:YAG laser assisted cataract surgery.Ophthalmic Surg Lasers,1998,29:185-189.
  • 6Duran S,Zato M.Erbium:YAG laser emulsification of the cataractous lens.J Cataract Refract Surg,2001,27:1025-1032.
  • 7Fishkind W,Bakewell B,Donnenfeld ED,et al.Comparative clinical trial of ultrasound phacoemulsifieation with and without the WhiteStar system.J Cataract Refract Surg,2006,32:45-49.
  • 8Packer M,Fishkind WJ,Fine WJ,et a1.The physics of phaco:a review.J Cataract Refract Surg,2005.31:424-431.
  • 9Gimbel HV. Divide and conquer nucleofractis phacoemulsification: development and variations. J Cataract Refract Surg,1991,17:281-291.
  • 10Koch PS, Katzen LE. Stop and chop phacoemulsification.J Cataract Refract Surg,1994,20:566-570.

共引文献39

同被引文献20

  • 1何伟,于海宽,徐明利,何向东,徐玲,张欣.自行设计的新型劈核钩在超声乳化白内障吸除术中的应用[J].中华眼科杂志,2005,4(1):65-67. 被引量:5
  • 2晏颖,邢怡桥,艾明.白内障超声乳化术后角膜水肿及角膜内皮失代偿的成因及防治[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2005,16(3):58-59. 被引量:14
  • 3吴峥峥,瞿佳,樊映川.白内障超声乳化术对角膜内皮细胞的影响[J].国际眼科纵览,2006,30(4):262-265. 被引量:40
  • 4顾铮,宋旭东,郑瑜.微爆破模式在超声乳化手术中的临床应用[J].眼科,2006,15(3):201-204. 被引量:5
  • 5Jacobs PM,Cheng I-I,Price NC,et al.Endothelid-Cell Loss after Cataract-Surgery-the Problem of Interpretation[J].Trans Ophthal- mol Soc UK, 1982,102(2) :291-293.
  • 6Baradaran-Rafii A, Rahmati-Kamel M, Eslani M, et al. Effect of hydrodynamic parameters on corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification [J].J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009, 35 (4) : 732-737.
  • 7Walkow T, Aader N, klebe S. Endothelial cell loos after phaco- emulsifcation:Relation to preoperative and intraoperative parame- ters [ J 1. Cataract Refract Surg, 2000,26 (5) : 727-732.
  • 8Hayashi K,Hayashi H,Nakao F,et al. Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury injury during phaeoemulsifieation [J].Cataraet Refract Surg, 1996,22(8) : 1079-1084.
  • 9Stevens G Jr, Long B, Hamann J M, et al. Erbium: YAG la- ser-assisted cataract surgery[J]. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers, 1998, 29:185-189.
  • 10Jurowski P, Gos R, Owczarek G, et al. Corneal endothelial cells" protection against thermal injury: influence of ophthalmic visco- elastic substances in experimental study on rabbits [J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2005,15 : 674-679.

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部