期刊文献+

硫丹对罗非鱼(Oreochromis aureus×O.niloticus)和草鱼(Ctenopharyngodon idellus)的急性毒性研究(英文) 被引量:5

Study on Acute Toxicity of Endosulfan to Tilapia(Oreochromis aureus×O.niloticus) and Grass Carp(Ctenopharyngodon idellus)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为控制虫害农业上大量使用硫丹,因此硫丹可通过多种途径进入水环境中。养殖环境和水产品中已发现硫丹残留,这给养殖环境和食品安全造成潜在威胁。通过半静态试验方法测定了罗非鱼和草鱼的半致死浓度,并估算了其在水环境中的安全浓度。结果表明,罗非鱼和草鱼的半致死浓度分别为1.97(1.26-2.87)μg·L-1和2.33(1.66-3.32)μg·L-1,安全浓度分别为0.20和0.23μg·L-1。为进一步验证这2种鱼对硫丹的抗性,将罗非鱼和草鱼在最低剂量组(0.7μg·L-1)中暴露60d,发现这2种鱼个体状态良好。因此,初步证明这两种鱼在水中的安全浓度比目前国家规定的标准值要高。但是关于硫丹对这2种鱼的内分泌干扰、生殖和生长等方面的影响还需作进一步的研究。 Endosulfan has been discovered in aquaculture environment and aquatic products,which was massively used in agriculture.It was a potential hazard to environment quality and food safety.The acute toxicity of endosulfan to tilapia(Oreochromis aureus O.niloticus) and grass carp(Ctenopharyngodon idellus) were measured using a semi-static bioassay.The 96 h LC50 values were 1.97(1.26-2.87) μg·L-1 and 2.33(1.66-3.32) μg·L-1 for Oreochromis aureus×O.niloticus and Ctenopharyngodon idellus,respectively.Correspondingly,the safe concentrations of endosulfan for the two fish were 0.20 and 0.23μg·L-1.Furthermore,the fish exposed to 0.7 μg·L-1 dose for 60 days were always in good physical condition.Therefore,the level of endosulfan in water which the two fish can be tolerant,was higher than the level reported in water environment in China.
出处 《生态毒理学报》 CAS CSCD 2011年第3期321-325,共5页 Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology
基金 Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund(Funds No.2008TS07 and 2010TS08)
关键词 急性毒性 硫丹 罗非鱼 草鱼 acute toxicity endosulfan tilapia grass carp
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1UNEP. 2008. Persistent Orgznic Pollutants Review Committee Fourth meeting, Geneva. Consideration of chemicals newly proposed for inclusion in Annexes A, B or C of the Convention: Endosulfan [OL]. http://chm.pops.int/Portals/ 0/docs/from _ old _ website/documents/meetings/poprc/ POPRC4/doc_e/POPRC4_doc_I 4 e.p df.
  • 2Kennedy I R, Sanchez-Bayo F, Kimber S W, et al. Off-site movement of endosulfan from irrigated cotton in New South Wales [J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2001, 30(3): 683-696.
  • 3Schulz R. Field studies on exposure, effects, and risk mitigation of aquatic nonpoint-source insecticide pollution: A review [J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2004, 33(2): 419-448.
  • 4Kumari B, Marian V K, Kathpal T S, et al. Status of insecticide contamination of soil and water in Haryana, India [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2008, 136(1-3): 239-244.
  • 5Li J, Zhang G, Guo L, et al. Organochlorine pesticides in the atmosphere of Guangzhou and Hong Kong: Regional sources and long-range atmospheric transport [J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41 (18): 3889 3903.
  • 6Jia H L, Li Y F, Wang D G, et al. Endosulfan in China 1gridded usage inventories [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2009, 16(3): 295-301.
  • 7Dalela R C, Bhatnagar M C, Tyagi A K, et al. Adenosine triphosphatase activity in few tissues of a freshwater teleost Channa gachua following in vivo exposure to endosulfan [J]. Toxicology, 1978, 11:361 -368.
  • 8Schimmel S C. Results: interlaboratory comparison-acute toxicity tests using estuarine animals. U.S. [R]. Gulf Breeze Florida: Environmental Protection Agency, 1981, EPA 600/ 4-81-003.
  • 9Hemmer M J, Middaugh D P, Comparetta V. Comparative acute sensitivity of larval topsmelt, A therinops affinis and inland silverside, Menidia beryllina to 11 chemicals [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1992, 11 (3): 401-408.
  • 10Naqvi S M, Hawkins R. Toxicity of selected insecticides (Thiodan, Security, Spartan and Sevin) to mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis [J]. Bulletin of Environment Contamination and Toxicology, 1988, 40(5): 779-784.

同被引文献86

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部