期刊文献+

烧伤创面病原菌定植及其危险因素 被引量:17

Pathogen colonization and risk factors of burn wounds
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析烧伤后不同时期创面病原菌定植情况及影响定植的危险因素。方法采集131例烧伤患者不同时期的创面分泌物标本进行细菌培养,对其相关资料采用回顾性调查方法,分析伤后各时期细菌定植情况及影响定植的危险因素。结果烧伤后第3、7、14天,创面细菌定植阳性率逐渐上升,分别为26.72%、61.32%、89.83%,差异具有统计学意义(x^2=71.02,P=0.00)。病区环境、年龄、创面用药、抗菌药物联用、烧伤深度、烧伤类型6方面因素在不同时期对病原菌在创面定植的影响具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论烧伤后创面病原菌定植率不断增高,多重耐药菌不断增多;对烧伤患者分区管理,合理用药,积极处理创面,严格执行消毒隔离措施,积极预防感染的发生至关重要。 Objective To analyze the pathogen colonization and risk factors of burn wounds in different periods. Methods Excretion of burn wounds in 131 patients were performed bacterial culture in different periods , relevant data were surveyed retrospectively, pathogen colonization and influencing factors were analyzed. Results The pathogen colonization rate increased gradually at the 3rd, 7th, 14th day after burn , which was 26. 72%,61.32% and 89. 93% respectively, there were significant difference (22 = 71.02, P〈0. 00), the influence of six risk factors on the pathogen colonization had statistical significance , including unit environment,patients' age, drug application at wound,combination use of antimicrobial agents , depth and types of burn(all P〈0. 05). Conclusion The pathogen colonization rate , multiple drug-resistant pathogen constantly increase after burn, it's very important to prevent burn wound infection by division management for burn patients, rational use of drug , active treatment of wounds, and strict executing of disinfection and isolation measures.
出处 《中国感染控制杂志》 CAS 2011年第3期194-197,共4页 Chinese Journal of Infection Control
基金 第四军医大学西京医院临床新技术 新业务项目支持(XJZT09H05)
关键词 烧伤 病原菌 细菌定植 创面感染 危险因素 burn pathogen bacterial colonization wound infection risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献19

  • 1乔亮,杨惠忠,袁克俭,王文奎,董鹤亮,许伟石.抑制应激反应措施对严重烧伤大鼠早期创面侵袭性感染的影响[J].中华烧伤杂志,2005,21(2):85-88. 被引量:10
  • 2吴晓燕,徐建,邹立新,赵思阳.烧伤感染的菌群分布及药物敏感性分析[J].国际检验医学杂志,2007,28(1):91-92. 被引量:10
  • 3陈铁夫,罗成群,周建大,朱颉,贺全勇,李萍,彭浩.烧伤创面感染的细菌学调查和耐药性分析[J].实用预防医学,2007,14(1):178-179. 被引量:10
  • 4Order SE . Experimental bum wound sepsis // Order SE , Moncrief JA. The burn wound. Thomas : Springfield Ⅲ, 1965 : 21 - 31.
  • 5许伟石 徐大忠 袁保政 等.焦痂下组织细菌定量的临床意义[J].上海第二医学院学报,1982,3(1):19-22.
  • 6Teplitz C, Davis D, Manson AD, et al. Pseudomonasburnwound sepsis. I pathogenesis of experimental pseudomonas burn wound sepsis. J Surg Res, 1964, 4(5) :200-216.
  • 7Marvin JA , Heck EL , Loebl EC , et al . Usefulness of blood cultures in confirming septic complications in burn patients: evaluation of a new method. J Trauma,1975,15(8) :657-662.
  • 8McManus AT , Kin SH , McManus WF , et al . Comparison of quantitative microbiology and-histopathology in divided burn wound biopsy specimens. Arch Surg, 1987,122 ( 1 ) :74-76.
  • 9Bone RC. Sir Isaac Newton, sepsis, SIRS, and CARS. Crit Care Med, 1996, 24(7) : 1125-1128.
  • 10Witte W, Cuny C, Klare I, et al. Emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive bacterial pathogens [J]. Int J Med Microbiol, 2008, 298(5-6): 365- 377.

共引文献251

同被引文献147

引证文献17

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部