“机器能否被骗”之再探讨

Rediscussion on "whether Machines can be Deceived or Not"

我国法律对"机器能否被骗"没有明确规定,相关立法存在矛盾;学界的理论探讨局限于"机器没有意识,是不可能被骗"的事实层面,将机器这种"物"提高到法律关系主体的程度,不够合理。对机器的功能及法律性质进行分类研究表明,机器背后的掌控者能够被骗,符合普通诈骗罪的犯罪构成要件,因而,我国在现有的法律框架下,没有增设使用计算机诈骗罪的必要。

Our legislation on ＂whether machines can be deceived or not＂ is not a definite regulation,even being contradictory;and theoretical discussion also confined to the fact level,which ＂machines out of conscious can＇t be duped＂,is unreasonable for machines with ＂articles＂ that are regarded as subjects of legal relationship.The research through classifying machines on function and legal nature shows that controllers behind machines can be cheat,corresponding with elements of ordinary fraud,so there is no need to add computer fraud in our existing legal framework.