摘要
文章对上个世纪末以来在阐释赵树理的《"锻炼锻炼"》中最有代表性的两种观点进行辨析,肯定"小腿疼"、"吃不饱"的外号"暗示了农民劳动积极性低下和生活待遇的低下"的观点,否定赵树理在创作中"怎么想就怎么写"的看法,认为小说"利用了当时一般文学创作惯用的歪曲生活真实的方法,曲折地反映出作家的民间立场"的观点确有"拔高"作家创作意图的嫌疑。指出在解读《"锻炼锻炼"》时,注意到由于政治话语、启蒙话语和民间话语的矛盾、裂隙产生的张力,导致作品出现歧义和多义的现象,才能避免得出偏执一端的结论。
This article analyzes two representative views about the interpretation on Zhao Shu - li' s "Exercise and Exercise Again" which began from the end of last century. It confirms the view that "calf pain" and "hungry" imphed"the peasants' labor enthusi- asm and life treatment is low". It also negates the view that Zhao Shu - li "wrote things as he pleased". There is a view that his novel used the common way of distorting real life and indirectly reflecting writers' non - governmental positions and tiffs view may be overstating writers' creation intent. The paper indicates that, in reading this novel, people can avoid paranoid conclusions by paying attention to the contradition among the political discourse, enlightenment discourse and folk discourse, and to the tension caused by the contradition, which led to the ambiguity and pelisem in creation.
出处
《上饶师范学院学报》
2011年第2期71-78,共8页
Journal of Shangrao Normal University
关键词
赵树理
创作意图
多重身份
政治话语
启蒙话语
民间话语
creation intent
"temporary" cadres
writer
"spokesman of peasantry interest"
political discourse
enlightenment discourse
folk discourse