期刊文献+

研发竞赛中参与人的策略与发起者的收益研究 被引量:1

Contestants' strategy choices and sponsor's revenue in R&D contest
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立了具有2个竞赛参与人的研发竞赛的非合作博弈模型,分别探讨了研发质量随机环境和研发质量确定性环境下竞赛参与人的均衡策略和竞赛发起者的期望收益。研究发现:在研发质量随机环境下存在着参与人的纯策略纳什均衡,而在研发质量确定性环境下只存在竞赛参与人的混合策略纳什均衡;当2个竞赛参与者的研发效率相同时,竞赛发起者的期望收益皆随参与者研发效率的降低而降低;当竞赛参与者研发效率的差异低于一定程度时,研发质量随机环境下的竞赛发起者的期望收益要低于研发质量确定环境下的期望收益。 A non-cooperative game model of R&D contest with two contestants is built and the optimal strategies of the contestants and compares the revenue of sponsor under the circumstances of stochastic R&D quality and deterministic R&D quality are discussed. The research shows that there exists pure strategy Nash equilibrium under the circumstance of stochastic R&D quality and there exists mixed strategy Nash equilibrium under the circumstance of deterministic R&D quality. When R&D efficiencies of two contestants are the same, the sponsor's revenue decreases with R&D efficiencies. When two contestants' R&D efficiencies differ less than some degree, the sponsor can achieve more revenue under the circumstance of deterministic R&D quality.
作者 彭鸿广
出处 《浙江科技学院学报》 CAS 2011年第3期234-238,共5页 Journal of Zhejiang University of Science and Technology
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(09YJC630208)
关键词 研发竞赛 研发质量 固定奖励 R&D contest R&D quality fixed prize
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1TAYLOR C R. Digging for Golden Carrots: An analysis of research tournaments[J]. The American Economic Review, 1995,85 (4) : 872-890.
  • 2KAPLAN T R, SELA A. Effective contests[J]. Economics Letters, 2010,106 (1) : 38-41.
  • 3CHE Y K, GALE I. Optimal design of research contests[J]. The American Economic Review, 2003,93(3) :646-671.
  • 4KONRAD K A, KOVENOCK D. Multi-battle contests[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2009,66(1):256-274.
  • 5乔恒,邱菀华.递增奖品R&D竞赛的模型设计与均衡分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(4):77-80. 被引量:7
  • 6FULLERTON R L, LINSTER B G. Using auctions to reward tournament winners: Theory and experimental investigations[J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 2002,33 (1) : 62-84.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Amegashie J A.An all-pay auction with a pure-strategy equilibrium[J].Economics Letters,2001,70:79-82.
  • 2Fang H.Lottery versus all-pay auction models of lobbying[J].Public Choice,2002,112:351-371.
  • 3Konrad K A,Schlesinger H.Rent-seeking and rent-augmenting games[J].The Economic Journal,1997,107:1671-1683.
  • 4Smith J M.The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts[J].Journal of Theoretical Biology,1974,47:209-221.
  • 5Skaperdas S.Contest success functions[J].Economic Theory,1996,11:283-290.
  • 6Tullock G.The welfare costs of tariffs,monopolies,and theft[J].Western Economic Journal,1967,5:224-32.
  • 7Vickrey W.Counterspeculation,auctions and competitive sealed tenders[J].Journal of Finance,1961,16:8-37.

共引文献6

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部