期刊文献+

熟悉性对中文成语理解的影响:事件相关电位研究 被引量:7

The Impact of Familiarity on Chinese Idioms Comprehension:an Event-related Brain Potential Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中文成语是惯用语的一种重要形式,采用中文四字成语作为实验材料,以事件相关电位为实验手段,通过N400和P600两种成分考察中文成语的认知理解过程。操纵两个因素,即熟悉程度(熟悉与不熟悉)和词语类型(成语、短语),要求被试对词语进行正误判断。结果提示,与四字短语相比,四字成语在大脑的理解加工存在区别。实验结果支持中文成语加工的构造模型。 Chinese idiom is an important form of idiom,this paper used Event-related potential(ERP)to investigate the cognitive process model of four-character Chinese idioms.The present study manipulated familiarity(familiar/unfamiliar)and word type(idiom/phrase).Subjects were asked to judge whether the final word is right which stochastic presented in the screen.The result showed that there is no significant difference between familiar idioms and familiar phrases in N400 amplitude,but have a significant difference between unfamiliar idioms and unfamiliar phrases;the P600 latency was quicker for familiar idioms than for familiar phrases,but there is no significant difference between unfamiliar idioms and unfamiliar phrases.Therefore,the comprehension of four-character idioms is different from four-character phrases,and configuration model adequate to explain the present findings.
出处 《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》 CSSCI 2011年第4期116-120,共5页 Journal of Educational Science of Hunan Normal University
基金 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金资助[教外司留(2008)890号]
关键词 中文成语 构造模型 分级显性意义模型 Chinese idiom configuration model graded salience model
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Cacciari; c., Padovani, R., Corradini, P. Exploring the relationship between individuals' speed of processing and their comprehension of spoken idioms[J].European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2007, ( 19 ): 417-445.
  • 2Cacciari, C., Tabossi, P. The Comprehension of Idioms [ J ]. Journal of Memory and Language,1998,(27),668-683.
  • 3Cacciari, c., Reati, F., Colombo, M.R., Padovanl, R., Riz zo, S.,& Papagno,C. The comprehension of ambiguous idioms in aphasic patients [ J ].Ncuropsychologia, 2006, (44): 1305-1314.
  • 4Cain,K.,Oakhill,J.,& Lcmmon,K. The relation betwe, n children's reading comprehension level and their comprehension of idioms[J].Joumal Experimental Child Psychology, 2005, (90): 65-87.
  • 5Giora,R. Understanding figurative and literal language: the graded salience hypothcsis[J].Cognitive Linguistics, 1997, (8): 183-206.
  • 6Hagoort,P. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension:ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations[J].Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2003, (15): 883-899.
  • 7Hahne,A.,& Friederiei,A.D. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs [ J].Cognitive Brain Research,2002, (13) :339-356.
  • 8Iakimova,G.,Passcricux,C.,& Hardy-Bayle,M.C. Interpretation of ambiguous idiomatic statements in schizophrenic and depressive patients:Evidence for common and differential coguitivc patterns [ J ].Psychopathology, 2006, (39): 277-85.
  • 9Kim,A.,& Osterhout,L. The independence of combinatory semantic processing:Evidence from event-related potentials[J].Journal of Memory and Language,2005,(52): 205-225.
  • 10Kutas,M.,& HiUyard,S. A. Brain potentials during roading reflect word expectancy and semantic association[J]. Halxire, 1994, (12) : 161-163.

同被引文献150

引证文献7

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部