期刊文献+

BTD、MPT方案序贯治疗新诊断的非移植多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效分析 被引量:1

Sequential therapy of BTD and MPT regimen for the newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients no eligible for bone marrow transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的回顾性总结BTD与MPT方案序贯治疗新诊断的非移植多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的临床疗效及不良反应。方法选取2006年1月至2010年5月应用BTD、MPT方案序贯治疗的新诊断非移植MM患者36例为研究对象,其中BTD方案诱导治疗至少2个疗程,达到部分缓解(PR)及其以上疗效后,改用MPT方案巩固治疗至少2个疗程,再应用小剂量沙利度胺维持治疗,直至疾病复发、进展。观察患者疗效及不良反应。结果应用BTD方案诱导治疗的36例MM患者中,7例(19.4%)获得完全缓解(CR),8例(22.2%)获得非常好的部分缓解(VGPR),14例(38.9%)获得PR,总缓解(OR)率为80.6%。29例有效(CR+VGPR+PR)患者应用MPT方案维持治疗,1例VGPR患者获得CR,3例PR患者获得VGPR,4例(1例既往CR,1例VGPR,2例PR)出现复发进展,其余患者病情平稳。在应用小剂量沙利度胺维持治疗的25例患者中,3例出现进展,其中2例死亡,其余患者病情稳定。中位随访16.5(2。46)个月,中位无进展生存期(PFS)尚未获得,预期1年生存率为86.0%,3年生存率为77.0%。不良反应主要包括血小板减少、周围神经病变、带状疱疹、胃肠道反应、贫血、感染、便秘、疲乏、皮疹等。3~4度不良反应发生率较低。结论BTD、MPT方案序贯治疗可以用于新诊断的非移植MM患者的一线治疗。 Objective To retrospectively analyze the outcomes and adverse effects of sequential therapy of BTD and MPT regimen for the newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients no eligible for high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Methods Thirty-six patients were involved in this study and the patients were treated with tandem therapy of BTD and MPT regimen. The patients were treated with BTD regimen as induced therapy no less than 2 cycles. When the patients got PR or above PR, they were treated with MPT regimen as consolidation therapy which was no less than 2 cycles. Then, the patients who achieved PR or partial PR were received MPT chemotherapy regimen as consequent treatment. After that, low dose thalidomide was used as maintenance therapy. The outcomes and adverse effects were retrospectively evaluated. Results Thirty-six patients were treated with BTD regimen as induced therapy. The results were that 7 patients (19.4 %) achieved CR, 8 (22.2 %) VGPR, 14 (38.9 %) PR and the OR rate was 80.6 %. The patients (n=29) who achieved no less than PR was treated with MPT regimen as consequent therapy. The resuhs were that four patients were in progression and the others were stable. Twenty-five patients were treated with low dose thalidomide as maintenance therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) did not reached yet until last follow-up (median follow-up time was 16.5 months). One-year overall survival rate was expected 86.0 % and 3-year expected overall survival rate was 77.0 %. The main regimen-associated toxicities included thrombocytopenia, peripheral ueuropathy (PN), Herpes Zoster, gastrointestinal symptoms, anemia, neutropenia, constipation, fatigue, rash and so on. The incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events was low. Conclusion Sequential therapy of BTD and MPT regimen can be used as the front-line therapy for the newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients no eligible for high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation.
出处 《白血病.淋巴瘤》 CAS 2011年第6期350-352,共3页 Journal of Leukemia & Lymphoma
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(30872982) 北京市自然科学基金(7082036)
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 新诊断 序贯治疗 Multiple myeloma Newly-diagnosed Tandem therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1杨光忠,王晶,付丽娜,张勇,陈文明.含或不含硼替佐米的联合化疗治疗伴肾功能不全的初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者的疗效分析[J].中华血液学杂志,2010,31(6):423-425. 被引量:5
  • 2Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leukemia, 2009, 23: 3-9.
  • 3Dufie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myelorna. Leukemia, 2006, 20: 1467- 1473.
  • 4Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, et al. CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2003, 13: 176-181.
  • 5Greipp PR, Miguel JS, Durie B, et al. International staging system for muhiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23: 3412-3420.
  • 6Reeder CB, Reece DE, Kukreti V, et al. Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: high response rates in a phase Ⅱ clinical trial. Leukemia, 2009, 23: 1337-1341.
  • 7Lahuerta JJ, Mateos MV, Martinez-Lopez J, et al. Influence of pre-and post-transplantation responses on outcome of patients with multiple myeloma: sequential improvement of response and achievement of complete response are associated with longer survival. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26: 5775-5782.
  • 8Palmnbo A, Bringhen S, Rossi D. Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone- thalidomide followed by maintenance with bortezomib-thalidomide compared with bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma: a randomized controlled thai. J Clin Oneol, 2010, 28: 5101-5109.
  • 9Kaufman JL, Nooka A, Vrana M, et al. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma: a retrospective study. Cancer, 2010, 116: 3143- 3151.
  • 10Ludwig H, Beksac M, Blade J, et al. Current multiple myeloma treatment strategies with novel agents: a European perspective. Oncologist, 2010, 15: 6-25.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V,Bamias A,Gika D,et al.Renal failare in multiple myeloma:incidence,correlations,and prognostic significance.Leuk Lymphoma,2007,48:337-341.
  • 2Kyle RA,Rajkumar SV.Criteria for diagnosis,staging,risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma.Leukemia,2009,23:3-9.
  • 3Durie BG,Harousseau JL,Miguel JS,et al.International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma.Leukemia,2006,20:1467-1473.
  • 4Kellum JA,Hoste EA.Acute kidney injury:epidemiology and assessment.Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl,2008,241:6-11.
  • 5Trotti A,Colevas AD,Setser A,et al.CTCAE v3.0:development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment.Semin Radiat Oncol,2003,13:176-181.
  • 6Greipp PR,Miguel JS,Durie B,et al.International staging system for multiple myeloma.J Clin Oncol,2005,23:3412-3420.
  • 7Augustson BM,Begum G,Dunn JA.et al.Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma:analysis of patients entered onto the United kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002-Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party.J Clin Oncol,2005,23:9219-9226.
  • 8Ludwig H,Drach J,Graf H,et al.Reversal of acute renal failure by bortezomib-based chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma.Haematologica,2007,92:1411-1414.
  • 9Chanan-Khan AA,Kaufman JL,Mehta J,et al.Activity and safety of bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients with advanced renal failure:a multicenter retrospective study.Blood,2007,109:2604-2606.
  • 10Roussou M,Kastritis E,Migkou M,et al.Treatment of patients with multiple myeloma complicated by renal failure with bortezomib-based regimens.Leuk Lymphoma,2008,49:890-895.

共引文献4

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部