期刊文献+

河岸材料对河流有机污染物降解能力的影响 被引量:5

Effect of River Bank Material on Organic Pollution Degradation Capacity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了干砌石、浆砌石、蜂巢格宾和生态砖等河岸材料对河流有机污染物降解能力的影响。4种材料中,以生态砖为河岸的河流中总有机碳(TOC)沿程降解率分别是蜂巢格宾和浆砌石的6.14和3.15倍(p<0.05);生态砖、干砌石和蜂巢格宾河段中溶解性有机碳(DOC)沿程降解率分别是浆砌石的10.68、6.60和6.08倍(p<0.05)。生态砖和蜂巢格宾构筑的河岸的河流中,悬浮和附着微生物脂磷含量显著高于干砌石和浆砌石(p<0.05),最多可达到7.27nmolP/cm2和58.16nmolP/cm2,悬浮微生物脱氢酶(S-DHA)、荧光素双醋酸酯(FDA)、附着微生物硝酸还原酶活性(F-NRA)、碱性磷酸酶活性(APA)也显著高于干砌石和浆砌石(p<0.05)。河岸材料影响了微生物生物量及硝化等关键生化反应过程的酶活性,从而影响了河流中有机污染物的降解。 Microbial biomass and enzyme activities for dry masonry, cellular gabion, eco-block and masonry were investigated to reveal the effects of different river bank materials on organic pollution degradation capacity. Total organic carbon (TOC) degradation ratio of eco-block bank were 6.14 and 3.15 times significantly higher than that of cellular gabion and masonry, respectively (p0.05). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) degradation ratio of eco-block bank, dry masonry and cellular gabion were 10.6, 6.60 and 6.08 times significantly higher than that of masonry, respectively (p0.05). Lipid phosphorus contents of suspended microbe and microbial film in river with eco-block and cellular gabion were up to 7.27 nmol P/cm2 and 58.16 nmol P/cm2 ,respectively. Dihydroartemisinin of suspended dehydrogenase activity (S-DHA), fluorescein diacetate activity(FDA), nitrate reductase activity of microbial film (F-NRA), alkaline phosphatase activity (APA) of eco-block were also significantly higher than that of dry masonry and masonry (p0.05). River bank materials affect organic degradation capacity by microbial biomass and enzyme activities.
作者 赵素 潘伟斌
出处 《环境保护科学》 CAS 2011年第3期20-23,共4页 Environmental Protection Science
基金 广东省科技计划项目基金资助(2009B030801003) 中山市科技计划项目基金资助(20092A142)
关键词 河岸 蜂巢格宾 生态砖 生态河道 有机污染物 降解能力 River Bank Cellular Gabion Eco-Block Ecological River Organic Contaminant Degradation Capacity
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Oscoz J, Pedro ML, Miranda R, et al. River channelization effects on fish population structure in the Larraun (Northern Spain)[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2005, 543: 191-198.
  • 2Wu YG, Hui L, Wang I-I, et al. Effectiveness of riverbank filtration for removal of nitrogen from heavily polluted rivers: a case study of Kuihe River, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China[J]. Environ Geol, 2007, 52: 19-25.
  • 3Vagnetti R, Miana P, Fabris M, et al. Self--purification ability of a resurgence stream[J].Chemosphe,2003,52: 1781-1795.
  • 4Rakesh R, Dash EVP, Bhanu P, et al. River bank filtration in Haridwar, India: removal of turbidity, organics and bacteria [J]. Hydrogeol J, 2010, 18:973-983.
  • 5白晓慧,张晓红,丁路生.城市景观河道不同类型驳岸界面微生物生态研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2007,23(3):90-92. 被引量:8
  • 6水和废水监测分析方法编委会.水和废水监测分析方法(第4版)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
  • 7于鑫,张晓键,王占生.饮用水生物处理中生物量的脂磷法测定[J].给水排水,2002,28(5):1-5. 被引量:160
  • 8李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999.119-120.
  • 9Cao X Y, Song C L, Zhou Y Y. Limitaions of using extracellular alkalinephosphatease activities as a general indicator for describing P deficiency of phytoplankton in Chinese shallow lakes[J]. J Appl Phycol, 2010, 22: 33-41.
  • 10蔡建楠,潘伟斌,曹英姿,吴云,张亮.广州城市河流形态对河流自净能力的影响[J].水资源保护,2010,26(5):16-19. 被引量:12

二级参考文献85

共引文献429

同被引文献63

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部