期刊文献+

Comparison of four scanning mobility particle sizers at the Fresno Supersite 被引量:2

Comparison of four scanning mobility particle sizers at the Fresno Supersite
原文传递
导出
摘要 Size distributions of ambient aerosols at the Fresno Supersite were measured with four commercially available scanning mobility particle sizers (SMPS). TSI nano, TSI standard, Grimm, and MSP instruments were collocated at the Fresno Supersite and particle size distributions were measured continuously from August 18 through September 18, 2005. For particles with diameters between 10 and 200 nm, differences among hourly-average ambient particle concentrations ranged from 0% between the TSI nano and Grimm in the 30-50 nm size range to 39% between the Grimm and MSP in the 10-30 nm size range. MSP concentrations were 10-33% lower than those measured with the TSI standard for particles smaller than 200 nm. The TSI nano and TSI standard agreed to within 5% in their overlapping size range (10-84 nm). The TSI nano and Grimm agreed to within 40% for 5-10 nm particles. Size distributions of ambient aerosols at the Fresno Supersite were measured with four commercially available scanning mobility particle sizers (SMPS). TSI nano, TSI standard, Grimm, and MSP instruments were collocated at the Fresno Supersite and particle size distributions were measured continuously from August 18 through September 18, 2005. For particles with diameters between 10 and 200 nm, differences among hourly-average ambient particle concentrations ranged from 0% between the TSI nano and Grimm in the 30-50 nm size range to 39% between the Grimm and MSP in the 10-30 nm size range. MSP concentrations were 10-33% lower than those measured with the TSI standard for particles smaller than 200 nm. The TSI nano and TSI standard agreed to within 5% in their overlapping size range (10-84 nm). The TSI nano and Grimm agreed to within 40% for 5-10 nm particles.
出处 《Particuology》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2011年第3期204-209,共6页 颗粒学报(英文版)
基金 sponsored by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) under DRI project number 04-307 U.S. EPA's Supersites Program at Fresno
关键词 Aerosol measurement SMPS Fresno Supersite Size distribution Ultrafine particles Aerosol measurement SMPS Fresno Supersite Size distribution Ultrafine particles
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Ankilov, A., Colhoun, M., Enderle, K.-H., Gras, J.,Julanov, Y., Kaller, D., et al. (2002a). lntercomparison of number concentration measurements by various aerosol particle counters. Atmospheric Research, 62, 177-207.
  • 2Ankilov, A., Colhoun, M., Enderle, K.-H., Gras, J., Julanov, Y., Kaller, D., et al. (2002b). Particle size dependent response of aerosol counters. Atmospheric Research, 62, 209-237.
  • 3Asbach, C., Kaminski, H., Fissan, H., Monz, C., Dahmann, D., Mulhopt, S., et al. (2009), Comparison of four mobility particle sizers with different time reso- lution for stationary exposure measurements.Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11, 1593-1609.
  • 4Birmili, W., Stratmann, F., Wiedensohler, A., Covert, D., Russell, L. M., & Berg, O. (1997). Determination of differential mobility analyzer transfer functions using identical instruments in series. Aerosol Science and Technolog3~, 27, 215-223.
  • 5Biswas, P., & Wu, C. Y. (2005). 2005 Critical review: Nanopartlcles ana the environ- ment. Journal of the Air ~~ Waste Management Association, 55, 708-746.
  • 6Chang, M.-C. 0., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Hopke, P. K., Yi, S. M., & England, G. C. (2004). Measurement of ultrafine particle size distributions from coal-, oil-, and gas-fired stationary combustion sources.Journal of the Air &" Wasfe Management Association, 54, 1494-1505.
  • 7Cben, L.-W. A., Watson,J. G., Chow, J. C., & Magliano, K. L. (2007). Quantifying PM2.s source contributions for the San Joaquin Valley with multivariate receptor mod- els. Environmental Science Technology, 41 (8), 2818-2826.
  • 8Chow, J. c., & Watson, J. G. (2007). Survey of measurement and composition of ultrafine particles. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 7, 121 - 173.
  • 9Chow, J. C., Bachmann,J. D., Wierman, S. S. G., Mathai, C. V., Maim, W. C., White, W. H., et al. (2002). 2002 Critical review discussion--Visibility: Science and regulation. Journal of the Air Waste Management AssociaUon, 52, 973-999.
  • 10Chow, J. C., Chen, L.-W, A., Watson, J. G., Lowenthal, D. H., Magliano, K. L., Turkiewicz, K,, et al. (2006). PM2.s chemical composition and spatiotempo- ral variability during the California Regional PMloJPNl2.s Air Quality Study (CRPAQS). Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, l 11(D!0S04), 1-17. doi:l 0.1029J2005]D006457.

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部